UBS Australian Share Fund (SBC0817AU) Report & Performance

What is the UBS Australian Share Fund fund?

UBS Australian Share Fund aims to provide investors with a total return (after management costs) in excess of the S&P/ASX 300 Accumulation Index (Benchmark) when measured over rolling five year periods. Eligible investments of the Fund comprise securities listed on the Australian Stock Exchange or those we reasonably expect to list within six months. The Fund may also invest indirectly in listed Australian securities via investments in other UBS managed funds, including the UBS Australian Small Companies Fund which in turn invests in companies which may be listed in New Zealand but not in Australia – this exposure is likely to be small. The Fund may invest in financial derivatives to gain exposure to the Australian sharemarket or to manage investment risk. Normally the Fund will hold between 30 and 60 stocks and sub funds with at least 75% of the Fund invested in stocks that comprise the S&P/ASX 100 index.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For UBS Australian Share Fund

UBS Australian Share Fund Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio declined by 3.30% during the month, underperforming its benchmark by 41 bps.

The largest positive contributors were CSL, QBE Insurance and Incitec Pivot. Our underweight to CSL contributed positively, as the globally focused biotechnology continued to weaken following the release of its FY24 group earnings guidance which was below market expectations (~10% lower than consensus for group FY24 NPATA). QBE Insurance outperformed as the insurer gained positive sentiment from a higher-for-longer outlook for medium-term interest rates, as well as a decline in the number of natural disasters during the peak of the North American catastrophe season and on the back of the El Niño declaration in Australia. Incitec Pivot’s outperformed after announcing an overall positive FY23 trading update.

The largest negative contributors were Tabcorp, Sims Metal and Northern Star. Wagering operator Tabcorp underperformed following Entain’s announcement of softer online gaming revenue. Sims Metal was a detractor as the scrap steel distributor lacked improvement in its trading conditions. Gold miner Northern Star underperformed due to a ~4% fall in the gold price from its near-record highs.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
UBS Australian Share FundSBC0817AUManaged FundsDomestic EquityAustralia Large Blend - Core / Style NeutralDomestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral IndexASX Index 200 Index389.67 M0.9%00.5%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
UBS Australian Share Fund6.75%6.05%12.09%10.01%8.23%12.09%13.01%13.97%-9.91%-12.31%-42.85%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
UBS Australian Share FundDomestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index-2.54%-0.47%-0.23%-0.05%-0.05%1.035.19%3.11%0.910.98

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
UBS Australian Share FundYes-https://www.ubs.com/au/en/asset-management.html-

Product Due Diligence

What is UBS Australian Share Fund

UBS Australian Share Fund is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index 200 Index and sits inside the Domestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The UBS Australian Share Fund has Assets Under Management of 389.67 M with a management fee of 0.9%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.5%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the UBS Australian Share Fund has returned 6.75% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 10.01% annualised and 13.97% each year since inception, which is when the UBS Australian Share Fund first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since UBS Australian Share Fund first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.39 with an annualised volatility of 13.97%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -9.91% and -42.85% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The UBS Australian Share Fund has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Domestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index of -2.54% and -0.47% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. UBS Australian Share Fund has produced Alpha over the Domestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index of -0.23% in the last 12 months and -0.05% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Domestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will UBS Australian Share Fund provide?

UBS Australian Share Fund has a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and a beta of 1.03 when compared to the Domestic Equity - Large Cap Neutral Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on UBS Australian Share Fund and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the UBS Australian Share Fund with the ASX Index 200 Index?

For a full quantitative report on UBS Australian Share Fund compared to the ASX Index 200 Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the UBS Australian Share Fund to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the UBS Australian Share Fund financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the UBS Australian Share Fund been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in UBS Australian Share Fund?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the UBS Australian Share Fund please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the UBS Australian Share Fund?

If you would like to get in contact with the UBS Australian Share Fund manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the UBS Australian Share Fund. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio decreased by 2.61% during the month, underperforming its benchmark by 184 bps.

The largest positive contributors were Carsales.com, NEXTDC and Wisetech Global. Online auto classified Carsales.com outperformed in August following its fullyear FY23 results (net profit increase of 23% was higher than expectations). Similarly, NEXTDC also outperformed on the back of its FY23 results release. Our underweight position in WiseTech was a source of outperformance, as the share price of the logistics industry software solutions provider fell after reporting its full-year results (earnings guidance was lower than consensus).

The largest negative contributors were ResMed, Alumina and Wesfarmers. The medical equipment manufacturer ResMed, underperformed due to increased focus on the potential future impact of weight loss drugs, an eventual return of competitor Phillips into the sleep-apnoea device market and reported decline of its gross margin. The share price of Alumina dropped after the alumina and aluminium producer reported a net loss in their half-year report. Our underweight position in Wesfarmers was a detractor as the diversified conglomerate outperformed during the period following its solid FY23 results, which was led by the core Bunnings business and Kmart.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio increased by 2.95% during the month, outperforming its benchmark by 6 bps.

The largest positive contributors were CSL, United Malt and Sandfire Resources. Biotechnology company CSL outperformed in July following the pre-release of earnings guidance in June which fell below market expectation (around 10% lower than consensus for group FY24 NPATA). United Malt outperformed during the month after European bidder Malteries Soufflet signed a binding deal to buy United Malt at $5.00 per share (a +45% premium to the undisturbed priced) following an extensive period of due diligence. Copper producer Sandfire Resources outperformed after posting a 13% quarterly production increase at its MATSA copper operations in Spain to achieve a total annual production of 99kt.

The largest negative contributors were Iluka Resources, National Australia Bank and Tabcorp. Iluka Resources underperformed after confirming it expects softer demand in 2H23 despite a robust June quarterly production report. The weaker outlook was also highlighted by competitor Tronox, further fueling market concerns. Our underweight to National Australia Bank was a detractor for the month as NAB benefitted from the market pricing in a higher probability of a soft landing and interest rates remaining higher for longer. Northern Star underperformed following a mixed June quarterly report; the gold producer had a strong quarter but FY24 production guidance was 8% below market expectations.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio increased by 1.12% during the month, underperforming its benchmark by 62 bps.

The largest positive contributors were CSL, Sims Metals and QBE Insurance. Our underweight to the globally focused biotechnology company CSL contributed positively to performance in June following the company updating earnings guidance which came in below market expectations (approximately 10% lower than consensus for Group FY24 NPATA). The weaker operating outlook was driven by lower growth in its core blood plasma business, Behring, as cost pressures push out the margin recovery story. Sims Metals outperformed during the month with US scrap steel margins remaining strong, supporting earnings from the company’s US business SA Recycling. QBE Insurance was a source of outperformance due to ongoing strength in the premium rate environment. The company has substantially improved its underwriting discipline and product focus over the last five years, and we believe its 10.2 times FY23 earnings multiple excessively discounts the risks inherent in its business model.

The largest negative contributors were Link Group, Fortescue Metals and Northern Star. Link Group fell at month-end after a large superannuation client (representing ~4% of revenue) elected not to renew its contract for FY25. Fortescue Metals traded higher as iron ore prices continued to rise, where the benchmark 58% Fe Index rebounded to close at US$96.70/t at month-end on expectations of Chinese economic stimulus. Northern Star underperformed in June as gold prices declined ~3% to close at US$1,908/oz at month-end and the market was disappointed with the announced US$1.5bn capital cost to expand the KCGM Mill. In spite of the market sentiment, Northern Star remains our preferred gold exposure given its asset quality and strong cost control.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio declined by -1.57% during the month, outperforming its benchmark by 96 bps.

The largest positive contributors were Xero (XRO), NextDC (NXT) and Worley (WOR). The online accounting software provider Xero outperformed following the announcement of a strong result, with subscribers and revenues in line with expectations and EBITDA ahead of estimates. Following the previous month’s largest ever individual contract announcement, data centre provider NEXTDC continued to outperform with the market’s conviction in Artificial Intelligence (AI) applications as a driver of demand grew. Worley also rallied in the month, with leading indicators (Factored Sales Pipeline +36%, Rolling 12 Month Bookings +28%, Backlog +8%) and structural drivers pointing to strong top-line growth.

The largest negative contributors were CSL (CSL), Tyro Payments (TYR) and Sandfire Resources (SFR). Globally focused biotechnology company CSL was a detractor as it outperformed, despite the challenging outlook for blood plasma economics which include elevated non-donor fee cost inflation, increased competition, adverse relative product growth rates and product substitution risk in the longer run.

Domestic payments provider Tyro underperformed after prolonged takeover negotiations came to an end. Sandfire Resources was a negative contributor, despite achieving an important milestone through the first concentrate production at the Motheo project in Namibia, as copper prices declined by about 5% to close out the month at US$3.68/lb.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio gained 2.54% during the month, outperforming its benchmark by 69 bps.

The largest positive contributors were Reliance Worldwide (RWC), Rio Tinto (RIO) (not held) and Fortescue Metals (FMG) (not held). The manufacturer and distributor of plumbing and heating parts, Reliance, outperformed following the release of the company’s March-quarter trading update. The diversified miner Rio Tinto and iron ore producer Fortescue were contributors during April, with both stocks underperforming on falling iron ore prices. During April the benchmark 62% Fe iron ore index fell 15% to close at $106.05/t as construction and infrastructure activity in China fell below expectations.

The largest negative contributors were United Malt (UMG), CSL (CSL) and NAB (NAB) (not held). The global commercial malt processor and distributor underperformed during the period. United Malt received a takeover bid from peer Malteries Soufflet priced at $5.00/share (+45% premium to prior closing price) in the prior month and retraced modestly from its highs to close near to deal terms. We believe that the likelihood of a deal proceeding is high. Our underweight to the globally focused biotechnology company CSL detracted from performance in the month, which included several minor but supportive data points for the outlook for Behring (approximately 65% of group earnings), its blood plasma business. NAB outperformed during the period as the Australian banking sector reversed some of the selloff in banks following the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and Credit Suisse.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio increased by 2.21% during the month, outperforming its benchmark by 245 bps.

The largest positive contributors were United Malt, NAB, and Xero. United Malt outperformed after a takeover bid was received from peer, Malteries Soufflet priced at $5.00/share (+45% premium to last close). NAB underperformed during the month, caught up in the global selloff of banks following the failure of Silicon Valley Bank, Signature Bank and Credit Suisse. Xero outperformed during the period after announcing plans to reduce the size of its workforce by 15%. The cost-out will lead to a reduction in operating expenditure/sales from the recent levels of 83-85% over recent results down to a more sustainable level of ~75% from FY24.

The largest negative contributors were Newcrest Mining, Incitec Pivot and Worley. Newcrest Mining traded higher as the gold price rallied 9% in March on macro uncertainty and an expected slowdown of interest rate rises globally. Incitec Pivot underperformed over the period as the price for Tampa ammonia fell 23% in March on weaker gas prices in Europe and weaker demand. Worley underperformed as spot WTI oil pricing fell 3% over the month.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

After fees and expenses, the Portfolio declined 1.40% during the month, outperforming its benchmark by 115 bps.

The largest positive contributors were QBE insurance (QBE), Link Administration (LNK) and The Lottery Corporation (TLC). Link Administration appreciated during the month as the company made material progress to resolving the uncertainty overhanging it UK Fund Solutions business. QBE Insurance performed strongly during the month in which it reported a solid full year result, largely in line with expectations, and with the guidance for gross written premium growth for 2023 of mid to high single digit growth leading to upgraded earnings expectations. The Lottery Corporation outperformed during the period, with the stock reporting a strong result underpinned by both a solid Lotteries print and improving Keno momentum.

The largest negative contributors were Northern Star (NST), PEXA (PXA) and Macquarie Group (MQG). Northern Star was a negative contributor during the month. Following a period of strong outperformance late in 2022, NST tracked the gold price lower in February, with gold declining 5% to US$1,817/oz at month end. PEXA underperformed during the month despite reporting a solid result for the six months to December 2022. With the background of the anticipated slowdown in house transaction volumes in Australia already an overhang on the stock, PXA guided to a slower roll out of its UK platform and higher than anticipated losses in its startup digital business. Macquarie performed strongly during the month on limited news flow, albeit that continued volatility in US and European energy markets through their winter seasons should be positive for MQG’s commodity business.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee