Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II (IOF0044AU) Report & Performance

What is the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II fund?

The Core Plus Fund II will invest in a diversified portfolio of Australian Real Estate Investment Trusts (‘A-REITs), in addition it may invest up to 20% of the Fund in real estate securities listed offshore. The offshore component draws off our highest conviction ideas from our team of highly experienced global portfolio managers. Domestic and global stocks are evaluated on a consistent basis, with the decision to allocate to global stocks based on the assessment of the relative risk and return of the stocks in each market. The Core Plus Fund II’s investment objective is to exceed the total returns of the Benchmark after fees on a rolling 3 year basis. In doing so, the Core Plus Fund II aims to provide Investors with a level of distributable income combined with the potential for long term capital growth sourced from real estate based revenue streams. Resolution Capital intends to hedge the capital component of the Fund.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II

Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of -8.7% for the month ended 30 September 2023, underperforming the Australian equities market (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index). A-REITs underperformed as global bond yields rose significantly over the month with fewer 2024 Federal Reserve interest rate cuts now expected in the U.S. The Australian 10-year bond yield is at the highest level in more than a decade.

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) held the cash rate at 4.1% in September in line with expectations but again noted “some further tightening may be required” depending on economic data. August inflation re-accelerated and the unemployment rate held at 3.7%.

Within A-REITs the office and industrial sectors outperformed, whilst retail and property fund managers underperformed.

Outperforming A-REITs included land lease community developer Ingenia Communities (INA) and Centuria Industrial REIT (CIP). Media speculation suggested INA was close to selling some seniors living assets. CIP sold two assets at Jun-23 book values whilst the stock price implies significant property devaluations. The Portfolio’s overweight positions in INA and CIP contributed to relative performance.

Underperforming A-REITs included interest rate sensitive property fund managers Cromwell (CMW), Charter Hall (CHC) and Home Consortium (HMC). High interest rates present headwinds to earnings via downward pressure on asset valuations and therefore management fees, as well as limiting transactional activity and equity inflows. The Portfolio’s underweight positioning in property fund managers contributed to relative performance.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec IIIOF0044AUManaged FundsProperty and InfrastructureAustralian Listed PropertyProperty - Australian Listed Property IndexASX Index 200 A-REIT Index27.51 M0.8%00.4%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II10.39%14.92%14.66%5.89%7.47%20.27%20.98%17.11%-13.11%-28.12%-66.96%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec IIProperty - Australian Listed Property Index-0.95%-0.09%-0.03%0%0%0.961.27%3.19%10.98

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec IIYes-https://rescap.com/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II

Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index and sits inside the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II has Assets Under Management of 27.51 M with a management fee of 0.8%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.4%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II has returned 10.39% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 5.89% annualised and 17.11% each year since inception, which is when the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.31 with an annualised volatility of 17.11%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -13.11% and -66.96% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of -0.95% and -0.09% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II has produced Alpha over the Property - Australian Listed Property Index of -0.03% in the last 12 months and 0% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Property - Australian Listed Property Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II provide?

Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II has a correlation coefficient of 0.98 and a beta of 0.96 when compared to the Property - Australian Listed Property Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II with the ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index?

For a full quantitative report on Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II compared to the ASX Index 200 A-REIT Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II?

If you would like to get in contact with the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Resolution Capital Core Plus Prp Sec II. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of 2.2% for the month ended 31 August 2023, outperforming the Australian equities market (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index).

The Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) held the cash rate at 4.1% in August but noted “some further tightening may be required” depending on economic data. Inflation pressures remain elevated but are receding and the unemployment rose to 3.7% in July.

The relative strong A-REIT sector performance was largely driven by industrial landlord and developer Goodman Group (GMG).

Consequently, within A-REITs the industrial sector outperformed, specialist and retail sectors trailed slightly whilst the office and diversified sectors underperformed.

August was filled with FY23 earnings results and maiden FY24 earnings guidance. Outperforming A -REITs included industrial REIT Goodman Group and fund manager HMC Capital (HMC). Goodman reported strong operating fundamentals, guided to a near sector-leading 9% FY24 earnings growth and disclosed a large data centre pipeline underpinning future development earnings.

HMC guided to “strong underlying FY24 earnings growth” (no quantification) and reiterated its target for $10bn of funds under management this year and $20bn in the medium term, highlighting growth avenues via global healthcare real estate, energy/infrastructure and private credit.

The Portfolio’s underweight positions in GMG and HMC detracted from relative performance.

Underperforming A-REITs included office and industrial landlord Growthpoint (GOZ) and diversified Charter Hall Long WALE REIT (CLW). Both companies have above sector average financial leverage. Higher debt costs are a key drag as GOZ guided to -15% FY24 earnings growth and CLW -7% for FY24 after -8% in FY23.

The Portfolio’s underweight positions in GOZ and CLW contributed to relative performance. Key A-REIT reporting season themes include:

• Few A-REITs will grow earnings in FY24 owing to higher debt costs overwhelming revenue growth.

• More FY24 earnings guidance misses than beats, generally due to new interest rate hedging crystallising higher FY24 debt costs.

• Office remains challenging. Occupancy was broadly stable though some reported declines. Tenant incentives remain elevated and the tone softened on proposed developments. Several A-REITs are trying to sell assets though buyers remain cautious. Dexus (DXS) sold 1 Margaret St, Sydney for 21% below Jun-22 book value and retained an equity holding given the acquirer could not raise all of the required capital.

• Retail metrics were encouraging. Occupancy is high (>98.5%), leasing spreads improved to flat/positive and retailers are generally in good financial shape heading into a tougher environment. Supply of new centres is low. Sales growth is decelerating into FY24, particularly for discretionary categories, likely impacting occupancy and leasing spreads. Rising property expense s including insurance/utilities/taxes are pressuring net rent growth.

• Industrial conditions remain favourable though there are some signs of demand softening from a high base. Occupancy is high (~99%), supply is delayed due to planning and new deal rents accelerated in 2H23 to >20% above in -place rents. Mirvac (MGR), Stockland (SGP) and GPT continue to prioritise growing industrial exposure, generally via development where returns have improved due to market rent growth.

• Residential sentiment is subdued near-term with more optimism into CY24 if interest rates stabilise . Affordability is constraining demand and first home buyers are absent, hit by lower borrowing capacity. Sales are at historically low le vels though sequentially improving from the 2022 trough. Enquiry has lifted but conversion is slow. Buyer defaults are above cycli cal averages. Positively, A-REIT residential developers are winning market share, production constraints are easing and construction cost inflation is moderating. Medium-term support from undersupply and migration remains intact. Re-stocking acquisition opportunities are increasingly attractive.

• Headwinds for fund managers persist. Transaction volumes are subdued, downward valuation pressure remains and equity inflows have slowed with some funds needing to satisfy redemptions.

• Self-storage FY24 revenue growth is slowing to long-run ~4-5% from elevated levels during the pande mic years. In FY23 occupancy loss was offset by rate growth. For both National Storage REIT (NSR) and Abacus Storage King (ASK) development is a key growth driver with attractive returns.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of 3.9% for the month ended 31 July 2023, outperforming the Australian equities market (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index).

After two months of consecutive rate rises the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) held the cash rate at 4.1% in July.

Sentiment regarding future interest rate rises shifted downward with the consumer price index (CPI) numbers for July coming in below market expectations.

Within A-REITs, the specialist and retail sectors outperformed whilst the industrial and residential sectors underperformed.

It was a relatively quiet month in terms of news flow ahead of the August reporting season. Outperforming A-REITs included agricultural REIT Rural Funds (RFF). RFF rebounded in July after a year of underperformance on the back of balance sheet concerns. Moreover, the REIT declared its final FY23 distribution in-line with guidance. The Portfolio’s underweight position detracted from relative performance.

Underperforming A-REITs included pub landlord Hotel Property Investment (HPI). During the month the Victorian Government announced its intention to implement a number of electronic gambling machine reforms. HPI has limited Victoria exposure, but other states could follow suit. The Portfolio’s overweight position detracted from relative performance.

Property fund manager Charter Hall Group (CHC) announced redemption deferrals for investors in its unlisted Charter Hall Direct PFA Fund (PFA). CHC stated: “we will only sell assets for prices that reflect fair value and given the lower sales volumes in the office investment markets, sales have proved challenging.” Three notable transactions occurred in July, with retail landlord Unibail-Rodamco-Westfield (URW) selling its stake in Westfield Mission Valley Shopping Centre in California for $290m. The deal reflects a 12% discount to the most recent valuation, an 8.5% cap rate and ~$249 per square foot. The deal pricing likely reflects a reasonable discount considering the competitive retail landscape in the area, with the higher quality, upscale Fashion Valley mall within walking distance.

Charter Hall Retail REIT (CQR) announced the sale of its 50% interest in the Brickworks Marketplace shopping centre in South Australia for $85 million. The sale price represents a 6.1% premium to the December 2022 book valuation.

Meanwhile, Stockland Group (SGP) expanded it lend lease communities development pipeline through the purchase of five lend lease community projects for $210m from the Living Gems Group. Three of the projects are currently under construction with the remaining two due to start construction within the next twelve months.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of -0.1% for the month ended 30 June 2023, underperforming the Australian equities market (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index).

To curb elevated inflation the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) hiked interest rates in June by 0.25% to 4.1%. The RBA has increased rates at 12 of 13 meetings since May 2022 to the highest level since 2012.

Within A-REITs, industrial and diversified sectors outperformed whilst the retail and office sectors underperformed. Outperforming A-REITs included fund manager Home Consortium (HMC) and office/self-storage landlord Abacus (ABP). HMC announced it had raised $350m in institutional capital for a new unlisted retail property fund. The Portfolio’s underweight position detracted from relative performance. ABP raised $225m of equity for its proposed new externally managed self-storage REIT tentatively named Abacus Storage King (ASK). Pricing of the new REIT reflected a 10% discount to Net Tangible Assets and the Portfolio participated in the raising. The Portfolio’s overweight position in ABP contributed to relative performance.

Underperforming A-REITs included retail landlord Region Group (RGN) and diversified landlord Charter Hall Long WALE REIT (CLW). RGN and CLW were amongst several A-REITs to announce preliminary June 2023 appraisal property valuations. RGN’s book value was marked down 1.7% whilst CLW’s was down 5.8%. The Portfolio’s overweight position in RGN detracted from relative performance whilst the underweight position in CLW contributed positively.

Broadly, appraised based property values have started to fall reflecting the pressure of higher interest rates and most importantly actual transactional evidence after a period limited activity. However, in aggregate A-REIT property values only fell ~3% over the six month period as capitalisation rates expanded by ~25 basis points, partially offset by higher income growth.

Appraised devaluations were most pronounced in office (down 4-8%) whilst non-discretionary retail was down 1.5- 4.0%. Industrial, self-storage and childcare values were flat with rent growth offsetting cap rate expansion. Mall landlords have yet to report.

Some notable transactions took place this month. Office landlord Dexus (DXS) sold an A-grade office building at 44 Market St, Sydney for $393m reflecting a 17% discount to book value, 6.6% cap rate and ~$12,800/sqm. The asset has a short 3-year lease expiry and is only 85% occupied. DXS also sold a business park asset in Victoria for $306m at a 7% premium to book value, bringing total FY23 divestments to ~$1.5bn. DXS has a large development pipeline to fund. The Portfolio’s underweight position contributed to relative performance.

We expect further devaluations will eventuate with more transactional evidence over 2023 as the market has had time to absorb and adjust to higher interest rates and more challenging economic conditions. A-REIT stock prices already reflect significant devaluations suggesting ~15%.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of -1.8% for the month ended 31 May 2023, outperforming the Australian equities market (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index). The portfolio underperformed the index.

After pausing in April, the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) unexpectedly hiked interest rates in May by 0.25% to 3.85%. Later in the month the unemployment rate rose from 3.5% to 3.7% but the monthly inflation indicator came in above expectations.

Within A-REITs, office and industrial outperformed while the diversified and retail sectors underperformed. Whilst house prices rose for a third consecutive month, residential developers generally underperformed after recent strong performance amid the renewed prospect of higher interest rates.

Outperforming A-REITs included fund manager Home Consortium (HMC), which announced progress in capital raising efforts for new healthcare and retail funds, and office landlord Dexus (DXS) which provided a quarterly update in which office occupancy increased by 0.1% to 95.4% and tenant incentives moderated. The Portfolio’s underweight positioning in both stocks detracted from relative performance.

Underperforming A-REITs included retail landlords Vicinity Centres (VCX) and Scentre Group (SCG). VCX upgraded FY23 earnings guidance to the top end of the prior range, which represents 11% growth, aided by recovering ancillary income. For the first time since 2018 leasing spreads turned positive. VCX also announced the sale of a 50% stake in its Broadmeadows regional mall at a ~4% premium to book value. Proceeds will fund developments.

Weighing on retail sentiment was likely several discretionary retailers (i.e. tenants) reporting slowing sales. The portfolio’s overweight positioning in both stocks detracted from relative performance.

Operating conditions remain favourable for industrial landlords with market rental growth buoyed by low current vacancy and tenant demand exceeding supply. Rent growth is offsetting capitalisation rate expansion, supporting valuations.

Goodman Group (GMG) upgraded FY23 earnings growth guidance from 13.5% to 15%. Although development work in progress fell 7% the $7bn p.a. production rate remained stable. Development margins are attractive and GMG is doing more development on balance sheet. Higher returning data centres now constitute 30% of the pipeline. Other landlords including GPT (GPT) and Centuria Industrial REIT (CIP) also reported accelerating double digit industrial releasing spreads. Underweight positioning in GMG, predicated on relative valuation, detracted from relative performance, whilst underweight positioning in GPT contributed.

Self-storage and office landlord Abacus (ABP) announced revaluations ahead of its proposed creation of an externally managed storage A-REIT. Self-storage values rose 2.6% whilst office/retail fell 5%.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of 5.2% for the month ended 30 April 2023, reversing last month’s losses, and outperformed the Australian equities market by 3.4% (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index). The Portfolio underperformed the index. During the month the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) kept interest rates on hold. This was the first pause after nine consecutive increases.

Australian housing values appear to have bottomed out. After falling 9.1% between May 2022 and February 2023 CoreLogic’s national Home Value Index increased by half a percent in April, following a 0.6% lift in March.

The RBA interest rate pause, combined with recovering housing prices, made residential exposed A-REITs the top performers within the index, with Mirvac Group (MGR), Stockland (SGP) and Ingenia Communities all producing double digit total returns during the month.

The second-best performing sector was retail, whilst industrial lagged this month. Two residential exposed A-REITs provided quarterly updates. First, MGR reduced its FY23 EPS guidance by 5% due to delays in residential settlements and development profits being pushed into the next year. It also announced progress in capital initiatives by finding two new investors for its Build to Rent segment and partners for new office and industrial development.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of -6.8% for the month ended 31 March 2023, underperforming the Australian equities market by 6.6% (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index). During the month the Reserve Bank of Australia (RBA) raised interest rates by 0.25% to 3.60% but suggested a pause is likely near term. The failure of Silicon Valley Bank in the U.S., and the bail-out of Credit Suisse by UBS in Europe, highlighted the fragility of banks with weak capital structures and concentrated asset exposures. What this means for the broader market including REITs is likely tighter lending conditions and reduced credit availability for sectors with weak operating fundamentals such as office. Within A-REITs, industrial outperformed whilst retail was in line with the benchmark and the diversified, fund managers and office sectors underperformed.

Defensive, lower leveraged A-REITs generally outperformed. The best performing A-REITs included residential developer and diversified landlord Stockland (SGP) and self-storage REIT National Storage (NSR). Stockland likely benefitted from the RBA nearing a pause in hiking interest rates and early signs of a stabilising residential property market.

Potential green shoots include monthly positive price growth and robust auction clearance rates, albeit the supply of listings is low. The Portfolio’s underweight position detracted from relative performance. NSR completed a $325m equity raising constituting ~11% of shares on issue. NSR will use the proceeds to fund acquisitions, developments and de-lever the balance sheet which is well placed. Operationally, revenue growth continues to decelerate as expected from an exceptionally high level. FY23 earnings growth guidance of 8.5% was reaffirmed.

The Portfolio participated in the raising and the overweight position contributed to relative performance. A large and complex deal occurred this month involving property fund manager HMC Capital (HMC) and its externally managed HealthCo Healthcare & Wellness REIT (HCW). HMC and HCW both raised equity to fund the acquisition of a $1.2bn portfolio of 11 hospitals leased to Healthscope. The portfolio was acquired on a 5.1% cap rate.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The S&P/ASX 300 A-REIT Total Return Index produced a total return of -0.4% for the month ended 28 February 2023, outperforming the Australian equities market by 2.1% (S&P/ASX 300 Total Return Index).

Within A-REITs, office outperformed whilst retail was in line with the benchmark and the diversified and industrial sectors underperformed.

The best performing A-REITs included National Storage REIT (NSR), diversified GPT Group (GPT) and childcare landlord Arena REIT (ARF). A key underperformer was land lease developer Ingenia Communities (INA) which downgraded earnings guidance due to delayed development settlements stemming from wet weather and labour shortages. The Portfolio’s overweight positions in NSR and ARF contributed to relative February was dominated by earnings releases. Key themes to emerge from A-REIT results include:

• Earnings guidance was largely reaffirmed, or previous wide ranges tightened, owing to greater visibility on higher debt costs. Broadly, passive A-REIT earnings growth will be negative in FY23 due to higher debt costs overwhelming rent growth, and many face further headwinds into FY24.

• Comparable rent growth is strongest for industrial, self-storage, childcare and A-REITs with a high proportion of inflationlinked lease escalators. • Balance sheet leverage remains moderate, with some exceptions. Interest rate hedging continues to be lifted, crystallising a higher cost of debt.

• Despite higher interest rates, appraised property devaluations were only modest at Dec-22 (single digit) given limited transactional evidence. Office was worst hit. Rent growth has partially offset mild capitalisation rate expansion, especially in industrial. Many A-REITs expect further devaluations to eventuate. Hence, some are targeting divestments to de-lever or fund developments.

• Capital partnering initiatives remain a focus.

• Retail was robust across malls and grocery-anchored shopping centres. Occupancy is high, leasing spreads are positive (grocery-anchored) or negative but improved (malls), tenant sales above 2019 levels and rent to sales ratios sustainable. Most expect tenant sales to slow over 2023 as higher interest rates cause consumption to slow. Vicinity Centres (VCX) was one of the few A-REITs to upgrade FY23 earnings guidance, which like some other retail landlords, was aided by the reversal of previous provisioning for COVID unpaid rent.

• Office remains challenged and the outlook cautious. Landlords lack pricing power as market vacancy is elevated (~13-15%) and tenant incentives high (~30%). A-REIT occupancy remains at 90-95%, but some like GPT saw this drop. Leasing activity has lifted but smaller tenants remain more active. Bifurcation remains a theme with newer, higher quality buildings with superior amenity outperforming. Physical office attendance remains at only ~60% of pre-COVID levels. Notably, several AREITs, including Dexus (DXS) and Mirvac (MGR), have deferred office developments due to soft market conditions. Both groups also continue to try to sell office buildings.

• Industrial operating conditions remain favourable. Market vacancy is very low (<1%), tenant demand strong and supply moderate. Consequently, A-REIT portfolios are essentially fully occupied with comparable rent growth of ~4% supported by leasing spreads on new lease deals of 10-20% above in place rents. Several A-REITs including Stockland (SGP), GPT and MGR continue to grow industrial exposure via development. • Residential development faces headwinds. Sales in masterplanned communities and apartment developments have fallen 40-50% from recent periods as buyers remain cautious in light of rising interest rates. Land lease volumes have been more resilient. Prices are expected to continue to fall as affordability remains stretched. Wet weather and labour shortages have delayed settlements into FY24 and defaults are expected to rise. Margins remain elevated given previous price growth exceeded construction cost inflation. • Self storage rent growth is decelerating to ~5-7% after an exceptionally strong few years. Rate growth is offsetting occupancy loss. Supply is moderate. NSR and Abacus Property Group (ABP) continue to grow via development. National Storage upgraded earnings growth guidance from at least 5% to at least 8.5%. ABP has proposed to spin off its $3bn storage portfolio to create an externally managed storage REIT. • Fund managers reported slowing transaction activity and equity inflows. This combined with potential property devaluations present headwinds to earnings growth.performance whilst positioning in GPT and INA detracted.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee