Platinum International Brands Fund (PLA0100AU) Report & Performance

What is the Platinum International Brands Fund fund?

Platinum International Brands Fund aims to provide capital growth over the long-term by investing in companies around the world with well-recognised consumer brand names (including producers of luxury goods, other consumer durables, as well as food, beverages, household and personal care products, retailers, and financial services). The Fund invests in a diverse range of branded consumer companies from well-recognised multinationals with iconic globally recognised consumer brands, through to companies with local or regional brands that have little or no recognition outside of their home market. The Portfolio will ideally consist of 40 to 80 securities that Platinum believes to be undervalued by the market. Cash may be held when undervalued securities cannot be found. Platinum may short sell securities that it considers overvalued. The Portfolio will typically have 50% or more net equity exposure. Platinum may use Derivatives for risk management purposes and to take opportunities to increase returns. The underlying value of Derivatives may not exceed 100% of the NAV of the Fund and the underlying value of long stock positions and Derivatives will not exceed 150% of the NAV of a Fund. The Fund’s currency is actively managed.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Platinum International Brands Fund

Platinum International Brands Fund Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Fund returned -4.7 % over the quarter. Returns were pressured by weakness in key discretionary retail holdings, as well as continuing softness in our core Chinese positions.

Our Fund results reflect a combination of pressures. Higher interest rates and weaker consumer spending have impacted the outlooks for many of our developed market holdings. The strength in our Vietnamese holdings – which bounced following a severe sell-off – was offset by weakness in our Chinese stocks as ongoing property market issues in that economy curtailed consumer spending. The strength of the US dollar and our relatively low exposure to that market was another headwind for performance relative to the broader market.

Our top contributors for the quarter included leading Vietnamese retailer Mobile World, whose share price rose around 20% over the quarter on improving sentiment toward the Vietnamese economy and results that showed business resilience and solid inventory control.

Jeweller Pandora rose 20% in response to results that beat market expectations as the turnaround under new management continues. We also saw a strong contribution (up nearly 9%) from Japanese confectionary maker Ezaki Glico which appears to have successfully passed on input cost increases into product pricing in key categories.

Key detractors from performance included apparel retailers SMCP (-52%) and Aritzia (-36%). SMCP fell early in the quarter as it reported disappointing first half results, then declined further in September as it released a profit warning primarily citing weakness in Chinese demand. Aritzia too called out weakening demand, but this was compounded by poor inventory control as the group builds out a large new internal warehouse system. Results released toward the end of the quarter showed an improving trend and the stock responded by bouncing 6% on the day of the release.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Platinum International Brands FundPLA0100AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLong ShortForeign Equity - Long Short IndexDeveloped -World Index619.15 M1.35%00.3%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Platinum International Brands Fund-2.35%-4.1%-5.92%-1.93%10.72%7.62%15.63%12.38%-12.66%-28.67%-28.67%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Platinum International Brands FundForeign Equity - Long Short Index-17.01%1.22%-1.17%0.17%0.17%0.517.89%8.2%0.420.75

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Platinum International Brands FundYes-https://www.platinum.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Platinum International Brands Fund

Platinum International Brands Fund is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Platinum International Brands Fund has Assets Under Management of 619.15 M with a management fee of 1.35%, a performance fee of 0 and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.3%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Platinum International Brands Fund has returned -2.35% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -1.93% annualised and 12.38% each year since inception, which is when the Platinum International Brands Fund first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Platinum International Brands Fund first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.6 with an annualised volatility of 12.38%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -12.66% and -28.67% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Platinum International Brands Fund has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index of -17.01% and 1.22% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Platinum International Brands Fund has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index of -1.17% in the last 12 months and 0.17% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Platinum International Brands Fund provide?

Platinum International Brands Fund has a correlation coefficient of 0.75 and a beta of 0.51 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Long Short Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Platinum International Brands Fund and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Platinum International Brands Fund with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on Platinum International Brands Fund compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Platinum International Brands Fund to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Platinum International Brands Fund financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Platinum International Brands Fund been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Platinum International Brands Fund?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Platinum International Brands Fund please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Platinum International Brands Fund?

If you would like to get in contact with the Platinum International Brands Fund manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Platinum International Brands Fund. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Fund (C Class) returned -3.4% for the quarter.1 This is a disappointing outcome in the context of buoyant global markets and reflects our geographic positioning and net exposure levels.

We have positioned the Fund with a relatively low net exposure due to our concerns about the outlook for developed market consumption given the likely impact of rapid interest rate increases on the broader economy. While in some markets and sectors we have seen rate rises cause a degree of turmoil (US regional banks, home-related spending, used car dealers, Sydney house prices), we have yet to really see this impact wage growth and employment.

Indeed, renewed optimism about the state of the consumer drove a rally in discretionary consumption stocks during the quarter. “Meme” stocks, electric vehicle stocks and other highly speculative issues were also beneficiaries of this reversal in sentiment.

Our net short position in US stocks meant we did not fully benefit from the strength in US markets, and the Fund is unable to own (due to its consumer brands focus) the vast majority of the Nasdaq stocks most exposed to the burgeoning artificial intelligence (AI) thematic. Our sizeable exposure to poorly performing Chinese stocks (-3% contribution to performance) also weighed on the Fund’s performance, as the anticipated rebound in the Chinese consumer has been weaker than expected.

Our Japanese investments delivered a positive return in local currency terms, but the weak yen meant this translated to a negative return in Australian dollar (AUD) terms. At the beginning of June, we hedged a large portion of our yen exposure back to the US dollar (which has been strong), but not before we incurred the negative eff ects of the move from around ¥133 to ¥139 to the USD (¥144 at the time of writing).

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Fund (C Class) delivered a solid 6.6% return for the quarter, lagging the broader market indices due to very defensive positioning (average net long exposure of 60% during the quarter).1

Over the year, the Fund gained 22.8%, which is considerably better than the general market. Of course, this performance was in part a rebound from a very weak prior year, but the three-year return of 15.5% p.a. is also quite satisfactory.

Interestingly, the first week of the quarter generated approximately 75% of the Fund’s total return, as the rally in our Chinese holdings continued. This dynamic then reversed with rising geopolitical tensions leading to a steady sell-off in China through most of the rest of the quarter, reinforced by weaker-than-hoped-for economic data as post-lockdown activity was impacted by a major wave of COVID infections.

The weakness in our Chinese holdings and the headwind from our short positions (-2.8% contribution to performance) were mostly off set by strength in some of our larger US and European positions. In particular, social media giant Meta Platforms rose 76% in the quarter as management demonstrated a firm commitment to reining in expenditures to shore up profitability. Leading low-cost European gym chain Basic-Fit rose 48% as market concerns around a potential need to raise capital proved unfounded, helped by European energy prices falling from extreme levels, thus improving the overall consumer demand outlook. This general improvement in sentiment in Europe also buoyed our positions in jeweller Pandora (+34%), apparel brand owner SMCP (+26%), car manufacturer BMW (+21%) and discount general merchandise retailer B&M European Value Retail (+17%).

Major detractors from performance included Chinese e-commerce player JD.com (-22%) and food delivery network Meituan (-18%), both falling on fears of increased competition from Bytedance-owned Douyin (China’s TikTok). Leading Vietnamese electronics retail chain Mobile World Investment fell 10% as a post-pandemic pullback in sales magnified the impact of general economic weakness stemming from falling export orders, coupled with issues in the property and banking sectors.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

A dramatic rally in Chinese stocks from their intra-quarter lows helped the Fund (C Class) deliver a pleasing 10.7% return over the quarter.

The stocks rallied as deeply negative investor sentiment on China’s government leadership and economic policies began to reverse as the likelihood of a near-term exit from zero-COVID policies increased. The solid quarter-end performance result, however, understates the extent of the rebound following a very rocky start through the end of October, as the Fund fell 6% due to increasing investor fears around China’s economy, even as global markets rose almost 7%, boosted by strong performance in the US and Europe.

From its intra-quarter lows, the Fund rose 16.7%. Despite the strength in global markets, our short book provided a positive contribution, assisted by the continued dismal performance of speculative former high-flyers. Of the ten stocks in which the Fund held positions that registered the largest declines in price during the quarter, eight were short positions for the Fund. This was a particularly pleasing result and contributed solidly to the Fund’s overall returns. Finally, the Fund benefited from our relatively large yen exposure and action taken in October to shift some US dollar (USD) exposure back into the Australian dollar.

The USD reversed dramatically over the quarter, falling against all major currencies from considerably overbought levels. The yen was particularly strong as the Bank of Japan signalled it may be moving toward the end of its ultra-easy monetary policy via its action to increase the target yield range for the 10-year Japan Government Bond. While the strength of the AUD and the global nature of the Fund meant that currency provided a slight negative contribution overall, our active currency management mitigated this significantly.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

It was a quarter of two halves for global equity markets, with a wild intra-quarter ride that resulted in a round-trip roughly back to where we started. The Fund (C Class) returned -1.5%. Stocks rallied strongly through to mid-August, led by many of the weakest performers from the June quarter. Through this period, the Fund gave up all of the positive relative performance it had enjoyed in the three months to June, largely due to losses in our Chinese stock holdings and our short positions in strongly rebounding US consumer discretionary stocks. In the second half of the quarter, our view of the rally being a brief positioning-driven event proved correct, as the market sold off through to the end of the quarter on further strong US infl ation prints and another hawkish rate increase by the US Federal Reserve (Fed).

The rapid increase in interest rates has caused market turmoil, leading central banks, such as the Bank of Japan and the Bank of England, to intervene in the currency and government bond markets, respectively, to ensure orderly pricing. Rising interest rates in the second half of the quarter benefi ted our short positions, both in relation to “bondproxy” consumer staples and economically sensitive consumer discretionary stocks. Soaring European energy prices compounded this effect, leaving consumers in that region with less in their pockets to spend on daily needs, let alone splurge on occasional wants. Indeed, investment bank Jefferies estimates income available for discretionary expenditure in the UK could fall 6%, even with increased government subsidies for household energy bills.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

Global markets experienced a great deal of turmoil in the quarter as rampant inflation inspired new levels of central bank hawkishness, which withdrew liquidity from markets, compressed valuation multiples, and raised fears of a forthcoming recession and thus deterioration in corporate earnings. In this context, it is pleasing that the Fund (C Class) returned a positive 5.6% for the quarter. The US bore the brunt of the selling in local currency terms. Especially hard hit were the more speculative growth stocks, as well as major benefi ciaries of the pandemic and/or related stimulus.

European markets fared somewhat better, but consumer businesses exposed to discretionary spending were sold off aggressively as their customers faced surging energy prices as a result of the ongoing Russian invasion of Ukraine, leaving less money for discretionary purchases. In stark contrast to recent experience, our Chinese holdings boosted returns signifi cantly (+5.1% contribution), as major cities emerged from harsh lockdowns and the government acted to stimulate the economy while delivering more favourable messaging around the policy outlook in relation to digital platforms. The hangover from consumer stimulus in the US and risks to valuations from infl ation and rising rates are factors we have been discussing for some time,² particularly in relation to spending on consumer durables that was pulled forward due to pandemic lockdowns. Our short positions against individual stocks exposed to these dynamics, as well as broader indices, contributed 8.6% to the Fund’s return for the quarter.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

We experienced a particularly difficult period for performance in the March quarter, with the Fund (C Class) buffeted by multiple negative market currents that resulted in a decline of -20.5%.

While the general market was also weak, Fund performance was particularly affected due to our sector and geographical positioning, which overrode the benefits of our low net market exposure and gains on our short positions (+1.6% contribution). Rapidly increasing interest rates led market instability earlier in the quarter, but it was the Russian invasion of Ukraine and its consequences that was at the core of the Fund’s losses – and not just in relation to our direct Russian exposure.

The ramifications of the invasion echoed through global markets, particularly businesses directly exposed to Central and Eastern Europe, and those reliant on commodity inputs or supply chains disrupted by the conflict and the related sanctions and fears of further sanctions.

The Fund held a position of 6.1% in two Russian stocks immediately prior to the Russia-Ukraine invasion. These were in TCS Group (3.2%) and Sberbank Russia (2.9%). Our assessment was that these would prove attractive investments should an invasion not occur, or should there be a speedy resolution to a conflict with a stern but ultimately manageable Western response. We viewed these two scenarios together as more likely than what has in fact eventuated – a bloody and drawn out conflict with a severe Western response and financial market reaction.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2021

Global stock markets extended their upward trajectory over the June quarter, buoying the Fund (C Class) to a 5.1% return. Unfortunately, we did not fully participate in the market upside, as we maintained a relatively low net invested position due to our view that many pockets of the market are heavily overvalued.

We observed interesting changes in stock correlations, with returns on individual stocks beginning to diverge greatly from their typical peer groups, as investors reappraised differences in business quality and growth outlook. This contrasts with recent times, where stocks that have similar high-level characteristics have often moved in lockstep. This dynamic was particularly pronounced in the ‘hot’ or speculative areas, but extended to previous beneficiaries of the ‘reopening’ trade, as it has become clearer which companies are benefiting the most from government stimulus spending and a return of customers to stores.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee