Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd (MAQ0825AU) Report & Performance

What is the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd fund?

Macquarie International Infrastructure Securities Unhedged aims to outperform the S&P Global Infrastructure Index (Net Total Return in $A) (Benchmark) over the medium to long term (before fees). It aims to provide a return comprising both income and capital growth. The Fund provides exposure to a diversified portfolio of global infrastructure securities which are listed, or expected to be listed, and are issued by entities that have as their primary focus (in terms of income and/or assets) the management, ownership and/or operation of infrastructure and utilities assets. The Fund may also provide exposure to hybrid or debt securities issued by infrastructure entities. Exposure to securities issued by vehicles controlled or managed by the Macquarie Group is limited to 5% of the net asset value of the Fund at the time of investment.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd

Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The Fund returned -4.77% (after fees), underperforming the benchmark which returned -4.42%.

• The major contributor to the strategy’s return was Rail / Other Transportation.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Electric Utility, Energy Infrastructure and Airports.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included Grupo Aeroportuario Pac-ADR, Aleatica SAB de CV and Grupo Aeroportuario Sur-ADR.
• Duke Energy Corp, China Merchants Port Holding and Auckland Intl Airport Ltd were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Airports, Toll Roads and Rail / Other Transportation.
• Positions in Electric Utility, Energy Infrastructure and Seaports detracted.

Key Contributors to Outperformance

• Grupo Aeroportuario Pac-ADR and Grupo Aeroportuario Sur-ADR – The Mexican airports underperformed due to press reports that the companies may be forced to absorb the US$4.2bn in debt linked to the construction of the New Mexico City Airport (Mexico City Airport Trust) in exchange for concession life extensions. The fund was underweight these stocks.
• Aleatica SAB de CV – During the month, IFM Investors announced it is investing a further MX$8.8bn (€473m) to buy the remaining 13.96% shares it does not already own in Mexican transportation company Aleatica. The manager’s IFM Global Infrastructure Fund (IFM GIF) has made a voluntary tender offer to acquire the remaining shares of Aleatica, increasing its ownership to 99.94%, and plans to delist Aleatica from the Mexican Stock Exchange. Aleatica owns a portfolio of 7 toll roads and 1 airport and holds transportation infrastructure concessions in the metropolitan area of Mexico City.

Key detractors from Outperformance

• Duke Energy Corp – The stock underperformed in line with the US Utilities sector which was lower due to the rising bond yields. The fund was underweight this stock.
• China Merchants Port Holding – The stock outperformed post its interim results announcement. The fund held an underweight position.
• Auckland Intl Airport Ltd – The Stock performed well post its FY23 announcement. The fund held an underweight position in the stock.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs UnhdgdMAQ0825AUManaged FundsProperty and InfrastructureGlobal Listed InfrastructureProperty - Global Listed Infrastructure IndexGlobal Infrastructure Index333.48 M1%0.00%0.66%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd0.27%5.01%5.15%11.78%8.71%9.9%10.81%10.83%-10.06%-10.06%-20.45%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs UnhdgdProperty - Global Listed Infrastructure Index0.19%0.39%0.05%0.08%0.08%0.825.56%4.93%0.860.89

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs UnhdgdYes-https://www.macquarie.com/id/en.html-

Product Due Diligence

What is Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd

Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Global Infrastructure Index and sits inside the Property - Global Listed Infrastructure Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd has Assets Under Management of 333.48 M with a management fee of 1%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.66%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd has returned 0.27% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 11.78% annualised and 10.83% each year since inception, which is when the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.68 with an annualised volatility of 10.83%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -10.06% and -20.45% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Property - Global Listed Infrastructure Index of 0.19% and 0.39% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd has produced Alpha over the Property - Global Listed Infrastructure Index of 0.05% in the last 12 months and 0.08% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Property - Global Listed Infrastructure Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd provide?

Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd has a correlation coefficient of 0.89 and a beta of 0.82 when compared to the Property - Global Listed Infrastructure Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd with the Global Infrastructure Index?

For a full quantitative report on Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd compared to the Global Infrastructure Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd?

If you would like to get in contact with the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Macquarie Int Infrastructure Secs Unhdgd. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

The Fund returned -1.32% (after fees), underperforming the benchmark which returned -0.90%.

• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Energy Infrastructure, Toll Roads and Rail / Other Transportation.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Electric Utility, Water and Electricity Generation.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included Aleatica SAB de CV, Shenzhen Intl Holdings and Grupo Aeroportuario DEL CENT.
• Orsted A/S, Japan Airport Terminal Co and PPL Corp were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Toll Roads, Electricity and Gas

Distribution and Electricity Transmission.

• Positions in Electric Utility, Water and Electricity Generation detracted. Key Contributors to Outperformance
• Aleatica SAB de CV – voluntary tender offer was announced at the end of August to take private 100% of Aleática’s public shares.
• Shenzhen Intl Holdings – stock underperformed due to general negative macro sentiment in China. The fund has an underweight position.
• Grupo Aeroportuario DEL CENT – a Mexican airport operator, rose on continued strength in Mexican passenger volumes.

Key detractors from Outperformance

• Orsted A/S – underperformed during the month as it announced likely write-downs of assets in the United States amounting to DKK16bn or c7% of market capitalisation. Orsted is facing challenges from the availability and cost of construction services to ensure the timely buildout of the pipeline of offshore wind projects in the US.
• Japan Airport Terminal Co – the stock performed well due to positive market sentiment regarding tourist activity Japan. The fund has an underweight position.
• PPL Corp – the stock underperformed in line with the US Utilities sector as US long bond yields reached levels not seen since 2007.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

The Fund returned -0.01% (after fees), underperforming the benchmark which returned 0.73%.

• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Water, Toll Roads and Electric Utility.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Electricity Generation, Airports and Energy Infrastructure.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included ADP, Ameren Corporation and CLP Holdings Ltd.
• Grupo Aeroportuario PAC-ADR, SSE PLC and Williams Cos Inc were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Seaports, Water and Electric Utility.
• Positions in Energy Infrastructure, Airports and Toll Roads detracted.

Key Contributors to Outperformance

• ADP – a French airport operator, fell on concerns around potential new French taxes on air travel and general concerns around future economic activity.
• Ameren – a US utility, performed well ahead of reporting its quarterly results on August 3rd.
• CLP – a Hong Kong utility, rose as the company is reported to be exploring options for its Australian subsidiary.

Key Detractors from Outperformance

• Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico – a Mexican airport operator, rose on continued strength in Mexican passenger volumes.
• SSE – a Scottish utility, fell on concerns around higher long-term UK interest rates and pressures in the UK offshore wind industry.
• Williams – a US midstream operator, rose after a prior period pullback and amidst a rebounding commodity price environment.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The Fund returned -0.26% (after fees), outperforming the benchmark which returned 0.07%.

• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Energy Infrastructure, Electricity Generation and Electricity Transmission.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Water, Electric Utility and Communications Infrastructure.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included ADP, CLP Holdings Ltd and Getlink SE.
• Williams Cos Inc, Severn Trent PLC and Targa Resources Corp were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Airports, Rail / Other Transportation and Toll Roads.
• Positions in Energy Infrastructure, Water and Electric Utility detracted.

Key Contributors to Outperformance

• ADP- the operator of French airports CDG and Orly, pulled back after its strong previous run on concerns of the sustainability of recent strong traffic growth and potential government actions around French concessions.
• CLP Holdings- a Hong Kong based utility, rose as news reports suggested the company could be considering options for its Energy Australia subsidiary.
• Getlink- the owner and operator of the Channel Tunnel, fell after prior strong performance on no notable news.
Key detractors from Outperformance

• Williams- a US midstream company, rose as natural gas prices recovered and the market was optimistic the company would use some its free cash flow to engage in share buybacks.
• Severn Trent- a UK water company, fell on concerns around negative news reports about Thames Water, an unlisted UK water company held by a consortium of private investors.
• Targa Resources Corp- a US midstream company, bounced back after recent weakness on no notable news.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The Fund returned -3.99% (after fees), underperforming the benchmark which returned -3.68%.

• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Rail / Other Transportation and Electricity Generation.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Electric Utility, Energy Infrastructure and Airports.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included SSE PLC, Dominion Energy Inc and Duke Energy Corp.
• Grupo Aeroportuario PAC-ADR, Flughafen Zurich AG-REG and Equitrans Midstream Corp were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Rail / Other Transportation, Electricity Transmission and Electric Utility.
• Positions in Airports, Water and Seaports detracted.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The Fund returned 4.83% (after fees), outperforming the benchmark which returned 3.95%.
• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Electric Utility, Airports and Energy Infrastructure.
• There were no detractors during the month.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included Grupo Aeroportuario Pac-ADR, ENAV SpA and Grupo Aeroportuario Sur-ADR.
• Getlink SE, Aleatica SAB de CV and ADP were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Airports, Seaports and Communications Infrastructure
• Positions in Electric Utility, Toll Roads and Rail / Other Transportation detracted.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The Fund returned 1.28% (after fees), outperforming the benchmark which returned 0.92%.
• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Airports, Toll Roads and Seaports.
• The major detractors to the strategy’s return were Rail/Other Transportation, Energy Infrastructure and Electricity and Gas Distribution.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included Dominion Energy Iinc, Aleatica SAB de CV and Duke Energy Corp.
• Grupo Aeroportuario del Pacifico, PPL Corp and Grupo Aeroportuario del Sureste were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Toll Roads, Electricity and Gas Distribution and Seaports.
• Positions in Airports, Rail/Other Transportation and Communications Infrastructure detracted.

Performance Commentary - November 30, 2022

• The Fund returned 4.41% (after fees), outperforming the benchmark which returned 3.12%.
• The major contributors to the strategy’s return were Electric Utility, Toll Roads and Airports
• There major detractors to the strategy’s return were Energy Infrastructure, Rail/Other Transportation and Electric Generation during the month.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index and in local currency terms, major stock contributors to the Fund’s return included Dominion Energy Inc, Vopak and Atlantia SPA.
• East Japan Railway Co, West Japan Railway Co and COSCO Shipping Ports Ltd were among the significant detractors.
• Relative to the S&P Global Infrastructure Index, the major positive contributors were positions in the Electricity and Gas Distribution, Electric Utility and Water.
• Positions in the Rail/Other Transportation, Energy Infrastructure and Toll Roads detracted. During a month of positive performance in global equities and positive performance in listed infrastructure, the strategy outperformed the benchmark.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee