Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr (SSB0515AU) Report & Performance

What is the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr fund?

Legg Mason Brandywine Global Income Optimiser A aims to earn a return before fees and taxes of 2% p.a. in excess of the Citigroup World Government Bond Index hedged into Australian dollars (‘Benchmark’) over complete market cycles of three to five years. The Trust generally aims to invest countries that are included in the Benchmark, however up to 40% of the Trust can be invested in countries outside the Benchmark. The Fund’s investment objective is to seek to generate a high and consistent level of income in all market conditions over a full market cycle with a secondary objective of capital preservation.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr

Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr Fund Commentary June 30, 2023

The Fund gained 1.28% (net) over the month of June. Emerging market local currency sovereign bonds and their respective currencies was the largest contributor over the quarter, specifically to Colombia, Brazil and Mexico as each of these countries are showing signs of peak inflation. U.S. corporate high-yield bond exposure also generated a positive return as credit spreads narrowed, with industrials and financials in particular outperforming. U.S. corporate investment-grade exposure was flat for the quarter. U.S. prime MBS exposure also generated a positive return given the resiliency in the U.S. residential housing market.

The Fund’s primary detractor was U.S. Treasury duration, as yields moved higher later in the quarter given comments from Powell on the likelihood of additional rate hikes. Short Japanese duration exposure also detracted, as the Bank of Japan maintained its accommodative stance despite rising inflation. Finally, the Japanese yen detracted given the widening monetary policy divergence between Japan and the U.S.

From a positioning perspective, duration stayed relatively consistent over the quarter. However, the Fund rolled down the curve with a portion of its U.S. Treasury duration exposure. The position is now split between the 10-year part of the curve and the 30-year part of the curve. U.S. dollar exposure was trimmed, as we believe the dollar will weaken given that U.S. relative monetary policy tightening is set to peak. The Fund slightly increased its emerging market sovereign local currency exposure, including to Brazil, Colombia and Mexico, as many emerging markets are experiencing disinflation. A position to the Japanese yen was also initiated, as it reached new year-to-date lows. The Japanese economy also continued to perform well. The Fund also took profits on its prime MBS exposure late in the quarter. Within U.S. corporate credit, the Fund took select exposure from the intermediate part of the curve in favour of shorter-duration credits. Given the inversion of the U.S. treasury yield curve, shorter-duration credits and their yields offered a favourable risk-return profile. Within U.S investment-grade credit, the Fund trimmed technology names in favour of financials.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc OptrSSB0515AUManaged FundsFixed IncomeMulti-Strategy IncomeFixed Income - Multi-Strat Income IndexGlobal Aggregate Hdg Index104.20 M0.65%0.00%0.13%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr5.09%7.59%6.65%-2.37%2.58%9.8%7.67%6.33%-7.08%-17.34%-17.34%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc OptrFixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index1.28%0.53%0%0.04%0.04%2.027.59%4.2%0.780.77

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc OptrYes-https://www.franklintempleton.com.au/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr

Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Global Aggregate Hdg Index and sits inside the Fixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr has Assets Under Management of 104.20 M with a management fee of 0.65%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.13%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr has returned 5.09% in the last month. The previous three years have returned -2.37% annualised and 6.33% each year since inception, which is when the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.22 with an annualised volatility of 6.33%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -7.08% and -17.34% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Fixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index of 1.28% and 0.53% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr has produced Alpha over the Fixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index of 0% in the last 12 months and 0.04% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Fixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr provide?

Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr has a correlation coefficient of 0.77 and a beta of 2.02 when compared to the Fixed Income - Multi-Strat Income Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr with the Global Aggregate Hdg Index?

For a full quantitative report on Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr compared to the Global Aggregate Hdg Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr?

If you would like to get in contact with the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Legg Mason Brandywine Glb Inc Optr. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

The Fund gained 1.85% (net) over the month of March. Developed market bond duration, specifically U.S. Treasuries and German bunds, were positive for performance. The Fund’s emerging market government bonds were beneficial, driven by allocations to Brazil, Colombia and Mexico. From a currency positioning perspective, exposures to the Brazilian real, Columbian peso and Mexican peso were additive for returns, as they all strengthened versus the U.S. dollar. Finally, the Fund’s allocation to U.S. corporate investment-grade bonds was rewarded. On the downside, a short duration position to Japan detracted from returns, as the Bank of Japan maintained its accommodative monetary policy and yields declined.

From a positioning perspective, the investment team’s view, safe haven duration and remaining liquid are appropriate in the current environment. The team believes increasing risks of recession justify some ballast in the Fund, including approximately 3.4 years of U.S. Treasury duration and 0.4 year of German bund duration. The Fund remains invested in liquid parts of the bond market should further volatility occur. The team also feels that U.S. corporate bonds provide a yield cushion for the portfolio. Given higher yields, there is a large amount of cushion for further spread widening to occur and still achieve a positive return. The team continues to favour lower-quality investment-grade securities as well as higher quality high-yield issuers. The Fund owns credits that the team feels comfortable holding for a longer time period, even with spread volatility. Finally, the Fund maintains select foreign currency positions, including a modest allocation to emerging market currencies. In the team’s view, the U.S. dollar will likely weaken in 2023 given U.S. relative monetary policy tightening set to peak and decelerating U.S. growth.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Fund fell 0.32% (net of fees) over the month of December. U.S. high-yield corporate credit was the largest contributor over the quarter. All sectors performed well broadly as spreads narrowed; however, metals and mining, as well as leisure names, outperformed. U.S. investment-grade corporates were also accretive, with financials in particular performing well. Currency exposures also contributed over the quarter, specifically the New Zealand dollar, the Japanese yen, the Thai baht and the Euro. After reaching a 21-year high in late September, the U.S. dollar subsequently gave back around half of its gain in the fourth quarter. The reversal was partially driven by concerns the economy could fall into a recession. Peruvian local-currency government bond exposure was also accretive. Developed market duration, specifically U.S. Treasuries and German bunds, was the largest detractor. Developed market bond duration rallied in November on the back of the expectation that the Fed had become less hawkish. However, rates rose in December and reversed any gains as central banks reiterated their commitment to tightening monetary policy to combat inflation.

From a positioning perspective, the Fund added select foreign currency positions, using the U.S. dollar as the funding currency. Most notably the Japanese yen, euro, Australian dollar, Colombian peso and Thai baht were added. The Fund also initiated and subsequently sold a tactical position to the New Zealand dollar over the quarter, which was accretive. We believe the dollar will likely weaken in 2023 given that U.S. relative monetary policy tightening is set to peak and due to decelerating U.S. growth outperformance. The Fund remains invested in developed market bond exposure, primarily via U.S. Treasuries and German bunds. Increasing recession risks justify some safe-haven duration on the long end of the curve (30 years), which we believe is increasingly anchored. The Fund tactically took profits in its corporate bond exposure after spreads narrowed. The team also increased exposure to select emerging market government bonds, including Brazil and Colombia. Finally, the Fund added to its mortgage-backed securities exposure, primarily via U.S. agency pass-through securities.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The Fund fell 4.76% (net of fees) over the month of September. The short-dated US Treasuries within the Fund shielded the Fund during a volatile quarter. While on the other side, developed market duration detracted, specifically U.S. Treasuries, as rates moved higher on the back of hawkish comments by developed market central banks and further rate hikes U.S. high-yield and investment-grade detracted; credit spreads widened as risk aversion remained elevated and rates moved sharply higher.

From a positioning perspective, we see increasing risks of recession which justify some ballast within the Fund, including approximately 4.5 yrs. of long-dated (30-year) US Treasury duration. We are tactically looking for opportunities to add duration. The strategy also holds short-dated U.S. Treasury floaters and remains invested in liquid parts of the bond market should further volatility occur. We are selective in our credits, and our corporate credit within the Fund remains allocated to those companies with strong fundamentals and pricing power. We have added some credits we feel comfortable holding for a longer time period, even with spread volatility. Index level spreads are now somewhat compelling, though we may not have seen the peak in credit spreads. With that said, given higher yields, there is a large amount of cushion for further spread widening to occur and still achieve a positive return. We continue to favour lower-quality investment grade securities as well as higher-quality high-yield issuers.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The Fund fell 2.75% (net of fees) over the month of June. The high yield allocation was the largest detractor for the quarter. Price action was initially driven by front-end rates moving higher; however, spread widening became the larger catalyst of returns toward the end of the quarter.

As of quarter end, spreads had returned to levels last seen in the summer of 2020. The selloff in high yield was broad in nature, although the strategy was particularly hurt by bonds within the lowest quality segments (i.e., single B and below). Developed market duration returned mixed results over the quarter. While yields were generally higher during the quarter, the market saw a sizable reversal in rate hike expectations in mid-June after the Fed raised its policy rate by 75 basis points.

The small relief rally provided some offset to the negative return contributions from the first two and a half months. The strategy’s exposure to short-dated U.S. Treasury floating rate notes provided protection during heightened volatility. Overall, there were limited opportunities to achieve positive returns during the quarter, with all segments including investment-grade corporates and securitized assets achieving negative returns.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2021

The Fund returned 0.69% (net of fees) for the month of December 2021. The key contributor to performance for the month was the exposure to corporate high yield. From a lower quality credit perspective, the overall U.S. high-yield market rallied in December, boosting its strong 2021 return. Losses booked from the sector in the previous two months were more than recouped as better than expected news flow on the Omicron variant was digested by markets.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

The Fund fell –0.70% during September, and was down –0.07% over the quarter. Within the high-yield credit market, cyclicals, especially energy-related securities, contributed to the Fund’s performance, as both oil and natural gas prices increased over the quarter. Exposure to the U.S. mortgage-backed market was also additive for returns as it continues to be supported by higher home prices and a muted foreclosure environment. On the downside, tactical exposure to high-quality government bonds across the U.S. and Europe was a significant detractor from results late in the third quarter. Finally, the Fund’s exposure to Mexican sovereign bonds was a headwind for performance, as they were negatively impacted by central bank rate hikes as a result of rising inflation, coupled with Fed’s perceived hawkishness.

From a credit perspective, the Fund continues to favor issuers within sectors that maintain pricing power. The Fund also has minimal exposure to select emerging market hard currencies. The Fund increased its duration throughout the quarter and ended the period at 5.4 years. This was primarily executed through investments in high-quality government bonds in the U.S. and France, as well as higheryielding European periphery securities. Policy uncertainty has heightened volatility across the bond market, and increasing duration felt like the prudent move. The Fund has been positioned for higher rates going forward, but increased macro risks have called into question the reflationary narrative in the near term. Finally, the Fund continues to favor lower-quality investment-grade securities and relatively higher-quality highyield issuers. The Fund’s corporate credit portfolio remains allocated to cyclical companies, and the manager remains selective in its credit exposure, as valuations are not overly compelling

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2021

The Fund posted a positive absolute return in August, up 0.12%. The Fund’s U.S. high-yield allocation was the largest contributor to performance as the sector benefited from strong corporate earnings and spread tightening. European high-yield positioning was also additive for returns. Elsewhere, an exposure to structured credit, primarily U.S. residential mortgage-backed securities, continued to produce results. On the downside, the Fund’s government sovereign exposure was the largest detractor in August, driven mainly by South Korea and France During the month, the Fund continued to modestly increase its duration. Monetary policy uncertainty has heightened volatility across the bond market, and the manager felt increasing duration was a prudent strategy. The Fund has been positioned for higher rates going forward, but increased macro risks have called into question the reflationary narrative in the near term. The Fund continues to favor lower-quality investment-grade securities as well as higherquality high yield issuers. The Fund’s corporate credit allocation favors pro-cyclical companies and the manager is highly selective in its credit positioning, as valuations are not overly compelling. The manager also continues to focus on companies that have pricing power I the current environment

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee