Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc (LAZ1240AU) Report & Performance

What is the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc fund?

Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc seeks to achieve total returns (including income and capital appreciation and before the deduction of fees and taxes) in excess of the MSCI All Country World Index (“benchmark”) with lower volatility over the long term.

  • The Fund will invest in listed companies which as a whole we expect will have lower volatility than the benchmark over a full market cycle.
  • The number of securities will generally range from 175 to 350 which means Lazard makes active investment decisions as to which securities the Fund holds.
  • The Fund is able to invest up to 25% in emerging markets.
  • The Fund is constructed by blending risk and stock ranking assessments, with the aim of producing the best possible return to risk ratio over time. The Fund is constructed according to broad diversification principles, including market capitalisation, region, position size and industry. The Fund may also invest in initial public offerings which are expected to be listed within 3 months from the date of purchase.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc

Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc Fund Commentary April 30, 2023

During the month, the Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund outperformed its MSCI All Country Index benchmark (in AUD, net of fees). Stock selection and sector positioning both contributed to the excess return. Stock selection was led by consumer discretionary and industrials. Financials and information technology holdings lagged. Allocation wise, the underweight to information technology and overweight to consumer staples added the most value. The underweight to energy detracted. Regionally, selection was strongest in Japan and the United States and weakest in the UAE and India.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD IncLAZ1240AUManaged FundsForeign EquityLarge Blend - QuantitativeForeign Equity - Large Quantitative IndexDeveloped -World Index91.39 M0.64%0.00%0.41%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc-1.68%5.84%9.92%8.61%8.19%8.7%9%9.46%-4.25%-6.81%-16.19%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD IncForeign Equity - Large Quantitative Index-0.73%-1.95%0.22%0.02%0.02%0.597.21%5.73%0.830.83

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD IncYes-https://www.lazardassetmanagement.com/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc

Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Developed -World Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has Assets Under Management of 91.39 M with a management fee of 0.64%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.41%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has returned -1.68% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 8.61% annualised and 9.46% each year since inception, which is when the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.76 with an annualised volatility of 9.46%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -4.25% and -16.19% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index of -0.73% and -1.95% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index of 0.22% in the last 12 months and 0.02% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc provide?

Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc has a correlation coefficient of 0.83 and a beta of 0.59 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Large Quantitative Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc with the Developed -World Index?

For a full quantitative report on Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc compared to the Developed -World Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc?

If you would like to get in contact with the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Lazard Global Managed Volatility AUD Inc. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Video Gallery

No current media available.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

In a quarter marred by the second largest US bank failure, a state-coerced bank merger and slowing corporate earnings, global markets still managed to post a gain of 7.3% (MSCI ACWI in USD as of 31 March 2023).

Fueling the optimism that dominated in January and March, many investors made the case that central banks would pivot from their hard line, anti-inflation stance. The extraordinary rise in global interest rates over the past 18 months continues to stifle lending and create potential asset-liability mismatches, while stoking conjecture over bank solvency. Easing inflationary pressures especially in Europe and the sudden fragility in the banking sector have fueled expectations of a central bank pivot. Inversion in the US and European yield curves, often a harbinger of recession, lessened in March but remained in place. The US dollar fell modestly during the quarter, despite higher nominal US rates. Oil prices sagged on fears of a global recession but ticked up at quarter-end on speculation of potential production cuts.

Regionally, broad-based gains were seen across most developed markets. Asian markets led during the month but lagged for most of the quarter. European markets led during the quarter as inflationary pressures continued to abate, fueling speculation that the European Central Bank (ECB) may be one of the first central banks to pivot from their tight monetary policies. At the same time, easing in supply constraints, lower input price pressures, and jobs growth sent the Eurozone Purchasing Managers Index higher for the fifth straight month. The United States, led by its large technology companies, outperformed the broader global benchmarks with the tech-heavy NASDAQ 100 rallying nearly 17% in the quarter. China reported its fastest rate of growth in non-manufacturing sectors (services) since 2011 but emerging markets lagged developed markets in the quarter.

While regional gains were evenly distributed throughout March, sector performance diverged considerably. A resurgence in technology and communication services stocks was the primary driver of the quarter’s strong return as technology stocks finished 20% higher for the quarter. The financial sector lost 1.5% in the quarter as rumors of multiple potential failures swirled around US regional banks and briefly Deutsche Bank. Weakness in oil prices helped make energy the worst-performing sector in the quarter.

Factor performance over the quarter was dominated by several broad-based themes, including a strong preference for larger cap and less leveraged companies. In our view, this was a function of concerns over the increasing likelihood of tighter lending standards resulting from the banking crisis. Less risky stocks (low beta and volatility) outperformed in March but lagged in the quarter. Sentiment lagged in the quarter driven by the selloff in momentum stocks in January. While companies with lower leverage and higher return on equity (ROE) outperformed, those with better operating margins did not. Growth measures were favorable for the quarter while value was mixed favoring more defensive equities.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund gained 1.71% during the month (net of fees), outperforming its MSCI All Country Index benchmark. Stock selection contributed to the excess return; sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was led by consumer discretionary and financials. Allocation wise, the underweight to materials and energy added the most value, which was offset by the underweight to information technology. Regionally, selection was strongest in Japan and China, and weakest in the US and Korea.

Performance Commentary - January 31, 2023

The Lazard ACW Global Managed Volatility Fund lost 2.0% during the month (net of fees in AUD terms), underperforming its MSCI All Country benchmark. Both stock selection and sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was led by utilities and healthcare. Allocation wise, the underweight to energy and overweight to communication services added the most value. But these were offset by the overweight to consumer staples. Regionally, selection was strongest in India and Thailand, and weakest in the US and Japan.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund outperformed its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark (net of fees in AUD terms) during the quarter. Both stock selection and sector positioning accounted for the excess return. Selection in consumer discretionary and healthcare were beneficial; Holdings in industrials and materials were the largest detractors. Underweights to information technology and consumer discretionary were the largest contributors along with operating cash. Underweights to energy and financials detracted. Regionally, selection was strongest in the United States and Switzerland, and weakest in Taiwan and Singapore. Alpha was mixed but positive as value measures offset weakness in sentiment which suffered large drawdown in November. Quality measures were flat to positive. Growth measure underperformed in October and December but overall, it was flat. Global stocks closed out 2022 with a monthly decline of 3.8% to finish the year with a loss of over 18%, its worst result since 2008. The US dollar continued its recent weakness helping pare the loss for US investors. The broad themes of 2022 – inflation, rising interest rates, war in Ukraine and slowing corporate profits, continued to dominate investor fears in December. Inflation showed signs abating but remained well above central bank targets causing the US Federal Reserve (“Fed”) to maintain its hawkish tone. The inverted yield curve, tepid consumer spending and weak manufacturing orders all point to a likely recession in 2023 with the bond market anticipating that the Fed will soften its tone in response. The Bank of Japan surprised the market by easing yield curve control by 25 basis points as they dealt with the highest inflation in over 40 years and an increasingly illiquid market for Japanese bonds. Chinese officials also began to relax their zero-COVID policies to boost domestic spending and international travel. Unfortunately, it also resulted in a near term surge in COVID cases at year-end. European inflation appears to have peaked in October but remains well above the European Central Bank targets. While the eurozone remains in a recession, optimism that the contraction will not be as deep as initially feared, surfaced in December. Asian markets, led by China, posted a positive return for the month but was the worst region for the year. North America (United States) markets trailed in the month as the US proved to be one of the weakest markets. Small cap stocks lost ground in the month but outperformed the board market indices. Sector dispersion was relatively modest with defensive sectors (utilities and consumer staples) leading for the month. Information technology and consumer discretionary shares lagged. Factor performance reflected investor trepidation as low beta and less volatile stocks outperformed in December. Value measures enjoyed a second strong month and were the best performing factor for the year in both developed and emerging markets. Beyond preference for defensive, value stocks, emerging and developed markets showed divergence in investor factor preferences. Growth measures sold off in developed markets, most notably in Japan but were favoured in emerging markets. Price momentum lagged again in emerging markets even after the extraordinary sell-off in November. Stocks with favourable sell-side analyst revisions underperformed in developed markets but were favoured in emerging markets. Quality measures were favoured in developed markets but showed mixed results in the emerging markets.

Performance Commentary - November 30, 2022

The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund underperformed its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark (net of fees in AUD terms) during the month. Sector positioning accounted modestly for the performance, while stock selection detracted. Stock selection was led by holdings in the energy sector. Holdings in industrials and materials were the largest detractors. Allocation wise, the underweight to energy added the most value, which was offset by the underweight to materials.

Regionally, selection was strongest in Canada, and weakest in the United States and China. Stocks that made the largest contribution to return included Japan Tobacco (JT), whose shares rallied over the month after the company and Altria Group accounted a joint venture to commercialise Ploom heated tobacco sticks products in the US. In our view, integration of the domestic tobacco business into JT will enhance the company’s competitive position in reduced risk products and organisational restructuring of the domestic tobacco business will free up some resources for RRP marketing and R&D investment. Japan Post delivered a strong month reaching its six-month peak. The Japanese government has financial and political incentives to ensure that the environment supporting the company’s profitability remains benign. Gilead Sciences continued its strong performance following solid third-quarter results that displayed the strength of the company’s dominant HIV regimen as well as oncology therapies. Sales were well ahead of market expectations, mostly due to continuing demand for the company’s COVID-19 drug. Detractors in the month included Kellogg, whose share price fell following Q3 2022 results.

The organic growth of 13% was largely driven by higher prices. Similar to its peers, Kellogg has strained to keep up with the rapid evolution of consumer trends which has weighed on volume growth. Public Storage’s stock continued to struggle throughout the month despite a decent set of numbers in the third quarter earnings results. We see increasing signs of growth moderation in the upcoming years with a slowing economy and additional storage supply coming to market. Molina Healthcare’s shares saw significant movement during recent months, with the share price falling after the third quarter earnings call.

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2022

In October, the Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund returned 5.7 (net of fees) underperforming its MSCI All Country Index benchmark by 1.0%. Stock selection accounted for the performance, while sector positioning detracted. Stock selection was favorable in five of eleven sectors, led by consumer discretionary and communication services. Allocation wise, the underweight to consumer discretionary and overweight to health care added the most value, which was partially offset by the underweight to energy. Regionally, selection was strongest in the US, and weakest in Japan and Canada. Stocks that made the largest contribution to return included Gilead Sciences, whose shares rose significantly by 13% after reporting third quarter results which topped expectations and boosted its full- year profit and sales outlook. The company generates stellar profit margins with its HIV and HCV portfolios, which require only a small salesforce and inexpensive manufacturing. Merck announced positive top-line results from the pivotal phase 3 Stellar trail evaluating the safety and efficacy of sotatercept. The stock rallied throughout the month. Shares of Everest rebounded strongly in October, responding positively to the third quarter earning calls. The reinsurer consistently grows its portfolio without substantially changing the risk profile. The management is targeting over 13% shareholder returns by 2023. Detractors in the month included WH Group, which reported third-quarter results that trailed the market’s estimates of revenue and operating profit. The deterioration in the operating margin was primarily caused by the upstream business across China and the US. Yamazaki Baking reported the third quarter earnings in the month and the result missed analysts’ forecasts. Bread companies in Japan have been hit hard by soaring material prices, as well as the declining population. SinoPac Financial reported missed performance for the first half of the year. The weakening in financial markets has generally led to a decline in banks’ wealth management business.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The Lazard Global Managed Volatility Fund lost 0.49% during the month outperforming its MSCI All Country World Index benchmark by 3.09%. Both sector positioning and stock selection accounted for the excess return. Stock selection was favorable in all sectors led by health care and industrials. Sector allocation was helped by the underweight to information technology and overweight in consumer staples. Utilities holdings was the only sector that underperformed.

Stocks that provided the largest benefit to the Fund’s excess return were all in the health care sector. Bristol-Myers Squibb announced scientific research across several solid tumors and received European Commission approval of Opdualag in unresectable or metastatic melanoma. A few analysts upgraded its ratings to overweight or buy during the month. Merck delivered a great month led by their blockbuster Keytruda as well as other oncology and vaccine recovery. There are some regulatory risks on Keytruda, but we believe, they are limited in the medium term. Eli Lilly continued its strong price momentum reporting favorable phase 3 results for a dermatitis medication. The company also received the first and only RET inhibitor approval from the FDA. Stocks that detracted in the month included Charter Communications, the judge order of USD 1.15 billion and the announcement of the retirement plan of the CEO cost the company’s price declined 28% in September. Comcast Corporation’s broadband business has stagnated, with the company adding no net subscribers over the most recently reported periods, as the demand seen through the COVID pandemic cooled off. Portland General Electric’s price suffered a sharp decline after the company shut off power for 37,000 customers in early September to protect against wildfires.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee