JPMorgan Diversified Risk (PER7633AU) Report & Performance

What is the JPMorgan Diversified Risk fund?

JPMorgan Diversified Risk aims to provide long-term capital growth by investing in multiple asset classes, globally, using a risk-weighted approach to asset allocation, using derivatives where appropriate. Systematic approach that provides long/short exposure to a diversified range of risk premia, across asset classes.

  • Portfolio targets equally weighted long-term risk exposures to various risk premia, grouped into four styles: quality, carry, momentum and value.
  • Overall portfolio is constructed to maintain a low correlation to traditional markets.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For JPMorgan Diversified Risk

JPMorgan Diversified Risk Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

The fund delivered strong returns in September, with positive performance across all the styles, led by the value style, with carry also performing strongly.

Single-stock equity factors had another strong month in aggregate. Individually, equity value was the leading contributor, continuing its positive momentum from the summer. This was followed by gains from the equity quality factor, while equity relative-value momentum was modestly positive.

The carry style contributed positively, driven by FX and commodities. FX carry was the strongest performer, driven by short exposures in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Credit carry was flat as a modest widening in spreads was offset by gains to the hedge.

Fixed income relative value factors were flat as gains made by a short exposure in Sweden were offset by a loss from a long exposure in Australia. Macro momentum-based factors were positive on gains by fixed income trend, where a net short duration exposure of around -1 year benefitted from rising yields. Commodity trend was flat. In contrast, FX momentum detracted from performance, driven by a short position in the Swedish krone and long positions in the Swiss franc and euro. Equity trend also modestly detracted in September, as a modest net long bias was a headwind.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
JPMorgan Diversified RiskPER7633AUManaged FundsAlternativesSystematic Risk PremiaAlternatives - Systematic Risk Premia IndexCredit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index0.38 M0.7%0.00%0%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
JPMorgan Diversified Risk

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
JPMorgan Diversified RiskAlternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
JPMorgan Diversified RiskYes-https://www.jpmorganam.com.au/wps/portal/auec/ContactUs-

Product Due Diligence

What is JPMorgan Diversified Risk

JPMorgan Diversified Risk is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Credit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index and sits inside the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The JPMorgan Diversified Risk has Assets Under Management of 0.38 M with a management fee of 0.7%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the JPMorgan Diversified Risk has returned in the last month. The previous three years have returned annualised and each year since inception, which is when the JPMorgan Diversified Risk first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since JPMorgan Diversified Risk first started, the Sharpe ratio is with an annualised volatility of . The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is and since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The JPMorgan Diversified Risk has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index of and since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. JPMorgan Diversified Risk has produced Alpha over the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index of in the last 12 months and since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will JPMorgan Diversified Risk provide?

JPMorgan Diversified Risk has a correlation coefficient of and a beta of when compared to the Alternatives - Systematic Risk Premia Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Diversified Risk and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the JPMorgan Diversified Risk with the Credit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index?

For a full quantitative report on JPMorgan Diversified Risk compared to the Credit Suisse AllHedge Fund Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the JPMorgan Diversified Risk to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the JPMorgan Diversified Risk financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the JPMorgan Diversified Risk been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in JPMorgan Diversified Risk?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the JPMorgan Diversified Risk please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the JPMorgan Diversified Risk?

If you would like to get in contact with the JPMorgan Diversified Risk manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the JPMorgan Diversified Risk. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

Following strong performance in June, the fund retracted some of its gains in July. The momentum style was the leading detractor, followed by the carry style. The quality factor was broadly flat, while the value factor contributed positively.

The single-stock equity factors were negative in aggregate. Individually, equity relative value momentum was the leading detractor. This was partially offset by gains to equity value, which, despite an equity market backdrop that has been broadly favourable for large cap growth, is nonetheless slightly positive for the year-to-date period.

The carry style detracted, driven by FX carry on negative returns from short exposures in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Commodity carry was modestly negative, while credit carry was flat.

Fixed income relative value factors were flat. This reflects continued low levels of risk exposure as fixed income value and carry continue to largely offset each other.

The macro momentum-based factors were a modest positive in aggregate. Equity trend was the leading contributor as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally. Fixed income trend was also positive. In contrast, FX momentum detracted as gains from a Japanese yen long position were offset by a loss from a short position in the Norwegian krone. Commodity trend was modestly negative.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

Following strong performance in June, the fund retracted some of its gains in July. The momentum style was the leading detractor, followed by the carry style. The quality factor was broadly flat, while the value factor contributed positively.

The single-stock equity factors were negative in aggregate. Individually, equity relative value momentum was the leading detractor. This was partially offset by gains to equity value, which, despite an equity market backdrop that has been broadly favourable for large cap growth, is nonetheless slightly positive for the year-to-date period.

The carry style detracted, driven by FX carry on negative returns from short exposures in the Japanese yen and Swiss franc. Commodity carry was modestly negative, while credit carry was flat.

Fixed income relative value factors were flat. This reflects continued low levels of risk exposure as fixed income value and carry continue to largely offset each other.

The macro momentum-based factors were a modest positive in aggregate. Equity trend was the leading contributor as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally. Fixed income trend was also positive. In contrast, FX momentum detracted as gains from a Japanese yen long position were offset by a loss from a short position in the Norwegian krone. Commodity trend was modestly negative.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2023

The fund delivered strong returns in June. The momentum style was the leading contributor, followed by the value and carry styles. Quality factor was flat.

The macro momentum-based factors contributed positively. Equity trend was the leading contributor, as the net long positioning helped performance during the market rally in June. Fixed income trend also contributed positively, recovering the previous month’s losses. In contrast, FX momentum modestly detracted, driven by a short position in the Norwegian krone and Australian dollar. Similarly, the commodity trend, which was positioned short, was modestly negative in June.

The single stock equity factors contributed positively in aggregate. Individually, equity value, which has been volatile year-to-date, was the leading contributor, offsetting the decline during the more challenging month of May. The equity relative-value momentum was also positive, potentially capturing the outperformance in growth stocks, while the quality factor was flat.

The carry style was also positive in June. FX carry was the strongest performer, driven by positive returns from long exposures in the Norwegian krone and Canadian dollar. Credit carry was a leading detractor while commodity carry was flat.

Fixed income relative value factors were modestly down. The carry factor was more adversely impacted than value, as gains made by short exposures in Sweden and the US 10-year swaps, were offset by long exposures in Australia and Denmark.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

The fund was modestly down in May. The carry style was the leading contributor while value and momentum detracted.

The carry style was the leading contributor to performance. FX carry was the strongest performer, driven by positive returns from short exposures in the euro and Japanese yen. This was supported by gains from fixed income carry, due to short exposures in the US and Sweden. Commodity carry also contributed while credit carry was flat.

The single stock equity factors detracted in aggregate. Individually, equity value was the leading detractor, retracing its gains from April, reflecting a volatile period of performance year-to-date. The equity relative-value momentum was positive, backed by the rally in growth stocks. The quality factor was flat.

Likewise, fixed income value was negative, driven by long exposures in Australia, the US and the UK 10-year swaps, which was partly balanced by a short exposure in Sweden.

The macro momentum-based factors detracted, as most underlying asset classes struggled. Fixed income trend saw the most significant decline, as the factor continued to deal with the lack of clear trend in fixed income markets. FX momentum also detracted, driven by a long position in the euro and a short position in the Swedish krone. The net long position in equity trend hurt performance, as markets pulled back in May. Commodity trend contributed positively.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

The fund delivered strong returns with positive performance across all underlying styles. The carry style was the leading contributor but was supported by decent gains to both value and momentum.

The carry style’s strong month was underpinned by gains spread across credit, fixed income and FX. Credit carry benefitted from continued strength in credit markets. FX carry contributed, driven by gains within emerging markets, while it was softer in G10 countries. In fixed income carry, a short exposure in the UK 10-year swap and a long exposure in Australia helped performance. Commodity carry was flat.

The single stock equity factors were positive in aggregate. Individually, equity value was the leading contributor in April. The quality factor was modestly positive, while equity relative-value momentum was flat.

The macro momentum-based factors contributed, with mixed underlying asset class performance. FX momentum led performance, driven by a long position in the euro and a short position in the Norwegian krone. A net long position in equity trend helped, as markets were positive. Fixed income trend was the most significant negative, as modestly short duration exposure was adversely impacted by lower government bond yields, as inflation dynamics in the US showed signs of improvement. Commodity trend was flat.

Fixed income value was positive, primarily driven by a short exposure in the UK and long exposure in the Australian 10-year swaps.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

After a strong February, the fund retraced some of its gains and ended the month down. The value and momentum styles detracted but were partially offset by gains in the carry and quality styles.

The macro momentum-based factors were the leading detractors. The fixed income trend was the most significant negative as the short duration exposure was adversely impacted by a flight to quality that drove government bond yields lower. The net long position in the equity trend initially detracted and was then whipsawed by a rebound. The commodity trend was flat, while FX momentum contributed modestly, driven by long positions in the euro and UK sterling.

The single-stock equity factors were a small negative in aggregate. Equity value was a leading detractor as macroeconomic moves appeared to favour growth or higher-quality names. This was reflected in positive contributions to both equity relative-value momentum, a leading contributor, and the quality factor.

Fixed income value detracted, driven by short exposures in Sweden, the UK and Denmark 10-year swaps.

The carry style was a contributor to performance. Credit carry was the leading performer, benefitting from strength in credit spreads. FX carry contributed; a long position in the Canadian dollar helped performance. Fixed income carry was positive, driven by gains from long exposures to Australia and Denmark 10-year swaps. Commodity carry was flat.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

The fund delivered strong returns in February. Performance was positive across most underlying factors, with no significant detractors. Value, momentum and quality styles contributed, while the carry style was a small detractor.

The single stock equity factors were in aggregate additive; performance was positive across underlying factors. Individually, equity value was the leading contributor, followed by the equity relative-value-momentum factor. The quality factor also was also up in February.

Fixed income value also contributed positively, driven primarily by short exposures in Sweden and Danish 10-year swaps. The macro momentum-based factors were positive in aggregate. Fixed income trend was positive, as the net short-duration exposure of -2.3 years benefitted from rising yields. FX momentum contributed, driven by short positions in the Norwegian krone and Canadian dollar. Commodity trend was also positive, driven by implied short exposures to agriculture and energy sub-groups. The net long position in equity trend however detracted, as stock markets fell.

The carry style was a small detractor to performance, although moves across the underlying factors were modest. Fixed income carry was modestly down: losses from long exposures to Denmark and Australia were largely balanced by gains on short exposures to UK and Swedish. FX carry also detracted; the long position in the New Zealand dollar hurt performance. Commodity carry was modestly negative while credit carry was flat.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee