Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail (ETL7426AU) Report & Performance

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail

Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail Fund Commentary March 31, 2023

The portfolio returned 7.28% in the quarter, versus the benchmark return of 6.60%.

The biggest contributors to portfolio return were Salesforce (profit margin expansion from cost efficiency efforts rapidly showing in numbers), Booking Holdings (strong Q4 results with gross bookings +58% year on year) and Rentokil Initial (uplift in organic growth guidance and Terminix synergies).

The biggest detractors to return were Frontier Communications (sold off on broker downgrade two days before month end), Eurofins Scientific (lag between higher costs and pricing to impact FY23 margins) and Danaher (market concern over a rumoured acquisition).

This quarter proved once again that equity markets can climb a ‘wall of worry’, rallying despite universally awful headlines.

2023 has so far seen the 2nd and 3rd biggest US bank failures in history, the hastily arranged rescue of Credit Suisse by UBS, ongoing interest rate hikes from central banks, nuclear rhetoric from Russia in Ukraine and the first indictment of a US President on criminal charges. Yet the overall index had a fine start to the year.

In truth market breadth was extremely narrow, reminiscent of 2020/21 where the market was propped up by NASDAQ. The outperformance of US tech in 2023 versus medium and smaller businesses is stark, March saw the second widest spread in the past 20 years with NASDAQ +7% versus Russell 2000 -5%. Given the portfolio’s underweight to mega-cap tech and overweight in medium and smaller-sized businesses, we would typically expect the portfolio to lag this type of market move.

As an indication, the top 10 index weights accounted for 4.2% of the benchmark’s 8.6% gain. In other words, the top 15% delivered almost 50% of the return.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
Cooper Investors Asian Equities RetailETL7426AUManaged FundsForeign EquityAsia Pacific w/o JapanForeign Equity - Asia ex Jap IndexWorld Emerging Markets Index0.00 M1.2%15.00%0.3%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail-3.92%-3.03%-25.54%NaN%-2.65%10.47%NaN%11.6%-25.54%NaN%-28.43%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Cooper Investors Asian Equities RetailForeign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index-3.57%-2.21%-0.73%-0.18%-0.18%0.797.11%5.52%0.790.89

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
Cooper Investors Asian Equities RetailYes-https://www.cooperinvestors.com/-

Product Due Diligence

What is Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail

Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against World Emerging Markets Index and sits inside the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail has Assets Under Management of 0.00 M with a management fee of 1.2%, a performance fee of 15.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.3%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail has returned -3.92% in the last month. The previous three years have returned NaN% annualised and 11.6% each year since inception, which is when the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail first started, the Sharpe ratio is -0.2 with an annualised volatility of 11.6%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -25.54% and -28.43% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index of -3.57% and -2.21% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail has produced Alpha over the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index of -0.73% in the last 12 months and -0.18% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail provide?

Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail has a correlation coefficient of 0.89 and a beta of 0.79 when compared to the Foreign Equity - Asia ex Jap Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail with the World Emerging Markets Index?

For a full quantitative report on Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail compared to the World Emerging Markets Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail please contact via phone or via email .

How do I get in contact with the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail?

If you would like to get in contact with the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail manager, please call .

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the Cooper Investors Asian Equities Retail. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

The Portfolio rose by 4.1% over the December quarter, compared to the Benchmark return of 5.6%. For the Financial Year to December 2022, the Portfolio rose by 0.9% whilst the Benchmark declined by 2.7%. Our China and Hong Kong holdings detracted 73bps of outperformance. After lagging the global and other Asian markets for over a year, the Chinese markets regained some lost ground and rose by 8.6% over the December quarter on optimism around China re-opening. Our Portfolio stocks gained 7%, as shares of AIA Group, Pinduoduo, and YUM China rose. As this letter went to print, nearly all COVID restrictions were lifted in China. Flights and trains resumed, offices re-opened, and quarantine and testing requirements were scrapped. We are pleased to see the final commitment to opening after one year of back-and-forth policy changes. However, three years of strict lockdowns had left indelible marks. Jobs that were lost could not be regained overnight. Businesses that shut also take time to re-open. We continue to observe significant financial pressure on businesses, consumers and local governments. Value for money becomes the most important element in purchasing decisions. Our agile management teams have already started to adapt their own businesses and products to this new reality. Instead of raising prices in pursuit of ‘premiumization’, they are now developing products with more affordable price points without sacrificing the consumer experience.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

The Portfolio declined by 3.0% over the September quarter, compared to the Benchmark decline of 7.8%.

Our China and Hong Kong holdings attributed 300bps of outperformance. The Chinese markets continue to underperform the overall region, declining by 16% compared to 8% for broader Asia. Both our capital allocation (the Portfolio is less exposed to China than the index) and stock picks (our Chinese holdings also fared better than the market) added value.

China Mobile, Yum China and YTO Express were the notable contributors, whilst China Meidong, China Mengniu, and Yili detracted from performance. We wrote in our last letter that a large part of our underperformance during the June quarter was due to our portfolio ‘missing out’ on the excitement of re-opening post COVID. We were confident that although our companies were not the hot ‘re-opening’ stocks, gradually normalizing operating conditions will suit them well over the long term. Our portfolio did not disappoint us – the June reporting period was a good one, with over 80% of our companies beating the expectations (albeit low ones) by a wide margin.

Their outlook for the future also remains optimistic. Take Tencent as an example. It recorded a small revenue decline of 3% during the June quarter, mostly driven by declining advertising revenues as Shanghai (the center for advertising in the country) was in lockdown. However, this was better than feared and more importantly, exciting new revenue streams are emerging for the first time in 18 months. Tencent’s video account advertising product is ramping up fast, enjoying a lot of user time and attention and just started to monetize. Tencent is confident in its ability to implement cost discipline and restart profit growth ‘regardless of the state of the macro economy”. Its management team is also putting their money where their mouth is – over the past few months, Tencent is liquidating its investments in other companies to buy back its own shares. Using their own words, “our stock is the best investment we can find in the market today”. China Mobile is another good example.

It reported a solid set of June results, with service revenues and EBITDA both growing a healthy clip of 7-8%. It also announced raising the dividend payout ratio from the current 58% to 70% or above in 2023, one year ahead of expectations. The strategic shift from heavy capex investment to capital return is very meaningful – as of 1H’21 the payout ratio was still less than 50%. China Mobile’s current dividend yield is 9%, and likely to rise further to 10% and beyond in 2023.

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2022

The Portfolio declined by 5.7% over the quarter, compared to the Benchmark decline of 0.63%. 90% of the underperformance came from China, where the Chinese markets performed well and gained 12% during the quarter. The Portfolio has less exposure to China than our Benchmark, and holds defensive companies that do not benefit quickly when the economy first re-opens.

With a return to normalcy and no further major lockdowns, our Portfolio holdings will stand to do well. Outside of China, Southeast Asia, India, Korea and Taiwan suffered declines ranging from 6% to 13%. Our stocks in these regions, in aggregate, performed roughly on par to the Benchmark. For the 12 months ended in June 2022, the Portfolio declined by 26%, compared to the Benchmark decline of 18%. We share the deep disappointment with our investors – CI staff are the largest group of unit holders of our Fund.

Quite a number of large Portfolio holdings performed strongly over the 2020-2021 period, as winners during the pandemic. Examples include private hospitals in India, or an eCommerce company in Taiwan. As their strong operating performance continued, their valuation multiples also rose to historically high levels. Both the relative performance and valuation multiple took a sharp negative turn as the Asian economies re-opened. We suffered the curse of the round-ticket journey.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2022

The Asian markets had a challenging quarter, declining 11% in AUD terms. It was a tumultuous ride. The Benchmark started off calmly with a relatively flat January. Then it entered a violent decline, bottoming out during mid-March, down nearly 18%. Then within two weeks it regained some lost ground and climbed 8% from the lowest level.

Unfortunately, the Fund did not keep up with our Benchmark and declined by 17%. The main reasons for our underperformance are:
• Some of our winners last year gave back part of their gains as Asia opened up. These are companies that had performed strongly during the lockdowns, and their stock prices rose meaningfully over the past two years. As various economies re-open, companies such as Dr. Lal Pathology Labs, Sea Ltd, Momo.com, and Jubilant Foodworks were perceived to encounter some near-term headwinds. We believe these companies are far from flash-in-the-pan ‘COVID stocks’. They have established long track records of performing well during normal business conditions and their competitive advantages extend far beyond the pandemic.
• Sudden COVID lockdowns in China led to factory closures yet again (Shenzhou) and further disruptions in the supply chain (JS Global).
• The Fund does not have exposure to sectors that the market favoured during the quarter where the Benchmark is exposed to, particularly Materials and Energy.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2021

The Portfolio lost 3.6% (net of fees) over the September quarter, compared to a steep decline of -5.8% for the Benchmark. All our focused industry verticals (consumer brands, software and hardware, and private healthcare services) contributed positively to out-performance.

Our investments in China / Hong Kong declined by 10% over the quarter, compared to 14% for the Benchmark. They generated 180 bps of outperformance for the Portfolio. Strong earnings results by core holdings such as China Mengniu, as well as our decision not to invest in a number of large benchmark stocks such as Alibaba contributed to the outperformance.

The operating environment has grown more complex in China. Regulatory scrutiny on various fronts, including companies’ social utilities, competitive practice and consumer protection is increasing. Investor concerns around the regulations drove down the share prices of Netase, Bilibili and JD.com despite of their resilient business results – all three companies reported earnings that exceeded our and consensus expectations.

Numerous snap lockdowns after a number of regional COVID resurgences shook consumer confidence, impacting our holdings such as Topsports. In addition, rising raw materials costs, port closures and potential energy shortages pressured the share price of Shenzhou

Performance Commentary - June 30, 2021

The Portfolio gained 7.8% over the June quarter, compared to 5.1% of our Benchmark. For fiscal year 2021, our portfolio returned 28.6% against the Benchmark of 28.1%. For the 3 months and financial year ended on June 30th 2021, our China and Hong Kong Portfolio holdings contributed 132bps and 94bps to outperformance, respectively. Our consumer holdings in the region such as Li Ning are the biggest contributors to outperformance. We wrote in our letter one year ago that these companies, often the leaders in their respective industries, emerged from the pandemic with solid balance sheets, more efficient operations and ready to grow again. They delivered just that in FY21 – as we publish this letter, our portfolio of 40 stocks are on track to growing earnings per share over 10% in Calendar Year 2021 over the pre-pandemic 2019 levels.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2021

The Fund invests in Asian companies where we identify a compelling value proposition through the application of the Cooper Investors’ proprietary VoF investment process. We focus on companies with high standards of corporate governance, and with management that think and act like owners. The Fund generally holds 30-70 high conviction stocks across Asia

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee