BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) (MAL0018AU) Report & Performance

What is the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) fund?

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) aims to provide high total investment returns through a fully managed investment policy utilising international equity securities, debt and money market securities, the combination of which will be varied from time to time both with respect to types of securities and markets in response to changing market and economic trends. Currency is actively managed in the Fund around a fully hedged Australian dollar benchmark. The Fund’s current investment strategy is to invest in global equities, fixed income and cash. The Fund aims to maximize total investment returns while managing risk and is generally diversified across markets, industries and issuers. The types of securities and markets the Fund invests in will vary in response to changing market conditions and economic trends. For example, the Fund may be substantially invested in US shares when they appear undervalued relative to other world share markets, while greater emphasis may be placed on fixed income securities when the risk of owning shares appears above average. This approach strives to achieve attractive total returns, while spreading the risks associated with investing in only one asset class or market.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) Fund Commentary September 30, 2023

Global markets declined in September, as Fed officials indicated that they intend to keep interest rates higher for longer during 2024 than they had anticipated earlier this year. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, fell -4.3% in September. For the second consecutive month, U.S. small-cap stocks were among the worst performing segments of the global equity markets, as rising rates particularly pummelled the prospects of small-cap companies with high growth potential but low levels of current cash flow. From a sector perspective, energy was the best performing segment of the global stock market on the back of surprisingly strong oil prices and was the only major sector within the MSCI World Index that posted positive returns during September’s swoon. Global bonds generally declined in September, with yields on the 2year U.S. Treasury reaching 5.17% mid-month, their highest level since June 2006. The prospects of a shallower easing cycle at the front-end of the curve sent yields at the long-end significantly higher, causing prices of long-term Treasuries to fall sharply. International sovereigns were weaker than their US counterparts, given the additional headwind of a stronger U.S. dollar.

In relative terms, prices of U.S. high yield bonds remained resilient, due to more modest exposure to duration at the index level the Bloomberg U.S. Aggregate Bond Index and the underlying resiliency of U.S. economic activity

While showing signs of deceleration, the U.S. economy remains adaptive and will likely avoid a “hard” economic landing or protracted recession in 2023. This is mainly driven by the economy being more service-oriented today than in prior decades, making it far less sensitive to interest rate changes. Our view is that inflation, employment growth, and wage pressures will continue to slow, and combined, this will be enough data to allow the Federal Reserve to end their hiking campaign, with a possibility of one more increase. That said, we believe the Fed is not going to consider cutting rates until they see durable declines in inflation. The team estimates that U.S. nominal GDP growth for 2023 has the potential to be ~4.5%, which could support U.S. corporate earnings. We believe that a stronger earnings outlook, coupled with decelerating inflation data and elevated corporate buybacks, could be a supportive environment for stocks.

That said, the team is cognizant that economic growth is decelerating given the cumulative effect of tighter monetary policy, shrinking credit availability, and slowing employment conditions. The growth paradigm outside of the U.S., remains challenged particularly in China, given a muted recovery post COVID, and Europe where central banks have a hard balance between persistent inflation and slowing growth. In this environment, our equity weighting declined with markets, bringing equity positioning to a slight underweight, with an emphasis on stable growth and quality. Over the month, we used the market weakness to add back to select sectors. Despite the recent increase in U.S. rates, we maintain exposure at the front and belly of the curve, on the view that U.S. inflation will follow a prolonged – but choppy – deceleration, the potential for the long-end to grind higher. The bulk of our fixed income exposure is in a diversified basket of corporate credit, securitized assets, and emerging market sovereigns. In-line with the fund’s risk aware mandate, we hold exposure to an array of portfolio hedges (in addition to duration), including derivatives, gold-related securities, cash and FX positioning.

Portfolio Manager, Russ Koesterich, has spoken as to why a moderation in economic growth may warrant an increased allocation to lower volatility stocks in portfolios, with a slight twist. One does not necessarily need to only look to traditional defensive sectors such as consumer staples or utilities for this exposure, but rather a focus on companies with a proven track record of stable revenue and margins.

Positioning overweights are concentrated in “stable growth” or “quality” companies that can generate earnings consistency and are aligned with long-term structural trends. This would include software and automation, positioned to grow from R&D, digital infrastructure, and innovation, as well as managed care and medical devices that benefit from aging demographics. In additional to automation companies, we also maintain industrials exposure via as defense companies that are attractively valued and in demand in a deglobalizing world.

Amidst heightened interest rate volatility, the information technology sector was one of the weakest over the month. While cognizant of the impact on higher rates, we used the market weakness as an opportunity to re-underwrite positioning and added to select technology companies, notably high-quality names who have generated consistent cash flows in varying economic cycles.

Given a more positive outlook for economic growth due to stronger domestic consumption, rising wages as well as increasingly shareholder friendly management practices in Japan, we increased exposure to select auto and capital goods companies positioned to benefit from consumption trends and governance improvements.

Consistent with the team’s more cautious near-term outlook, we used the low volatility observed across the options market to opportunistically add stock replacement trades whereby similar exposure was created via long call options while trimming the stock exposure on the same company, to maintain similar upside with less downside risk should prices decline.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)MAL0018AUManaged FundsMulti-Asset61-80% Growth Assets - DiversifiedMulti-Asset - 61-80% Diversified IndexMulti-Asset Growth Investor Index609.43 M0.2%0.91%0.6%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)3.55%8.07%11.4%1.41%7.02%9.79%10.03%9.18%-6.37%-16.83%-27.44%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index1.51%0.7%0.04%0.08%0.08%1.194.09%4.75%0.930.86

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)YesPO Box N43, Grosvenor Place, Sydney NSW 122002 9272 2200https://www.blackrock.com/auishares.australia@blackrock.com

Product Due Diligence

What is BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against Multi-Asset Growth Investor Index and sits inside the Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) has Assets Under Management of 609.43 M with a management fee of 0.2%, a performance fee of 0.91% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.6%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) has returned 3.55% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 1.41% annualised and 9.18% each year since inception, which is when the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.45 with an annualised volatility of 9.18%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -6.37% and -27.44% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index of 1.51% and 0.7% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) has produced Alpha over the Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index of 0.04% in the last 12 months and 0.08% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) provide?

BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) has a correlation coefficient of 0.86 and a beta of 1.19 when compared to the Multi-Asset - 61-80% Diversified Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) with the Multi-Asset Growth Investor Index?

For a full quantitative report on BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) compared to the Multi-Asset Growth Investor Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) please contact PO Box N43, Grosvenor Place, Sydney NSW 1220 via phone 02 9272 2200 or via email ishares.australia@blackrock.com.

How do I get in contact with the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D)?

If you would like to get in contact with the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D) manager, please call 02 9272 2200.

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the BlackRock Global Allocation Fund (Aust) (Class D). All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - August 31, 2023

Global markets generally declined in August, as volatility at the long end of the U.S. Treasury curve weighed on risk sentiment for much of the month. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, fell -2.4% in August. Non-U.S. stocks declined sharply as the U.S. dollar appreciated over 1.8% during the month. Chinese stocks fared particularly poorly as ongoing problems in the country’s residential real-estate sector and a lack of meaningful stimulus continue to weigh heavily on both consumer and investor confidence. From a style perspective, large-cap stocks generally outperformed their small-cap peers, while growth stocks outperformed value stocks. Global bonds generally declined in August on the back of Fitch Ratings downgrade of the U.S. government’s credit rating from AAA to AA+, a first by a major ratings firm in more than a decade. The decision sent yields on 10-year Treasuries to their highest level since last November, pushing yields higher across nearly all corners of the bond market and weighing sharply on stock prices. Non-U.S. bonds performed particularly poorly due to “sticky” inflation data out of Europe and an appreciating U.S. dollar. The one segment of the bond market that was positive was U.S. high yield. Robust July consumer data and a still strong U.S. labour market led investors to conclude that recession risks are diminishing, leading to a preference for owning credit spreads rather than long-duration bonds.

Performance Commentary - July 31, 2023

Global markets continued to rally in July on the combination of lower-than-expected inflation and better than expected economic growth. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, advanced +3.4% in July, with cyclical sectors such as Energy, Industrials and Materials among the best performing stocks in the global indexes. Outside the U.S., emerging market stocks, as measured by the MSCI Emerging Markets Index, were among the equity market’s best performing segments, as investors anticipated that China’s government would provide policy support to shore up consumer confidence as economic growth in the country has struggled to find its footing post COVID. Global bond performance was split in July. Corporate bonds, as measured by the ICE BofA/ML U.S. Corporate Index, advanced as the prospects of better than anticipated U.S. economic growth lowered the likelihood of recession and corporate defaults.

Long-dated U.S. government bonds, as measured by the ICE BofA/ ML 10-Year Treasury Index, fell, however, as the U.S. Federal Reserve resumed its increase of the Fed funds rate at the end of the month and signalled that further rate hikes might still be warranted in the future, absent continued progress on the inflation front. International bonds (FTSE Non-USD World Gov’t Bond Index), generally rose during the month, aided by a weakening U.S. dollar. Emerging market bonds (JPM EMBI Global Core Index) were boosted by interest rate cuts in a number of jurisdictions across Asia and Latin America.

Despite a historic rise in short-term interest rates and the abrupt tightening of monetary policy, we believe that the U.S. economy will likely avoid recession in 2H’23 and possibly the entirety of 2024. Many U.S. consumers, corporations, and municipalities have been able to withstand the impact higher short-term interest rates because they successfully locked in low, long-term fixed rate borrowing costs during the pandemic. In addition, with over $3 trillion in fiscal stimulus still yet to be spent and with significant excess savings remaining on household balance sheets, the lagged effect of massive fiscal spending is acting to materially off-set the lagged effect of restrictive monetary policy. With U.S. services spending still below its historical trend, U.S. inventory restocking likely to be a tailwind for economic growth, and inflation still annualizing at 3%, our view is U.S. nominal GDP may remain as high as 5% for the remainder of 2023, supporting earnings growth and taking some pressure off corporate profit margins. That said, this dynamic also implies stickier inflation and greater difficulty to generate slack in the system. As such, it is prudent to take the Fed at their word on the potential for additional rate hikes. We believe that inflation is likely to gradually come down over the coming quarters (albeit not to the equilibrium experienced in prior cycles) as supply shocks wear-off, restrictive monetary policy works to contain cyclical parts of the economy and the extended use of technology help push prices down. In this environment, we have increased our equity exposure to a moderate overweight, with an emphasis on stable growth and quality. We are constructive on fixed income as shortterm U.S. interest rates are at elevated levels relative to recent history, though maintain an underweight to duration as U.S. recession risk has receded. Most of our fixed income exposure is in a diversified basket of corporate credit, securitized assets, and emerging market sovereigns. In-line with the fund’s risk aware mandate, we hold exposure to an array of portfolio hedges.

Performance Commentary - May 31, 2023

Global markets were generally negative in May, as concerns about a potential U.S. debt default and possible credit downgrade, coupled with softer-than-expected Chinese growth, weighed on risk appetite. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, fell -1.0% in May, led lower by Chinese and European shares. Emerging market stocks, which possess a significant amount of both direct and indirect exposure to China, also struggled. However, in the U.S., large-cap stocks, as measured by the S&P 500 Index, experienced modest advances, powered by gains in some of the country’s largest software and semiconductor stocks, due to optimism related to advances in artificial intelligence (AI).

Global bonds fell in May, as investors evaluated the most recent U.S. inflation prints and concluded that the Fed might still have more work to do to contain price pressures. Although goods inflation in the U.S. continues to show signs of receding, services inflation remains stubbornly high. Duration sensitive long-maturity bonds, including 10-year U.S. Treasuries, were among the fixed income sector’s worst performers during the month, while overseas sovereigns were further weighed down by an appreciating U.S. dollar.

In May, we added to equities in recognition of a resilient US economy, continued strength across corporate earnings and a nominal GDP environment, that while decelerating, has proven to hold up better than expected at the beginning of the year. That said, we maintain a small underweight vs. our benchmark given near-term volatility caused by uncertainty around persistent inflation, tightening credit conditions and elevated valuations.

Within sector positioning, our overweights are concentrated in “stable” or “high quality” growth companies that can generate earnings consistency and are aligned with long-term structural trends. This would include industries such as medical devices and managed care that benefit from aging demographics, software and AI positioned to grow from R&D, digital infrastructure, and innovation, luxury goods manufacturers that benefit from a resilient consumer and defense companies that are in demand in a deglobalizing world.

Performance Commentary - April 30, 2023

We modestly added to exposure to gold-related securities (~1%), primarily through call options on gold ETFs. We felt the additional gold exposure had the potential to provide a small hedge to elevated equity volatility caused by concerns about the health of the banking sector. Gold prices could experience further support if real interest rates begin to plateau/decline after several quarters of sharp increases.

Underweight the U.S. Dollar (58% vs. 60% benchmark), as we believe that the U.S. Federal Reserve is approaching the end of a historic tightening cycle. Going forward, we believe there is room for the dollar to retrace some of its historic gains from 2021 and 2022 as central banks outside the U.S. continue to finish their own rate hike campaigns even after the Fed reaches its terminal level. As a result, we are overweight the Japanese Yen and Euro, as well as Mexican peso and Brazilian real.

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

Global markets generally posted sizeable gains in March after experiencing significant volatility mid-month, as investors shrugged off the first two major banking collapses in the U.S. since the 2008 Financial Crisis. Silicon Valley Bank (SVB) and Signature Bank were placed under the control of the FDIC after severe deposit flight quickly jeopardized their ability to continue operations. The FDIC’s rapid decision to guarantee all deposits at both banks along with the Federal Reserve’s commitment to provide substantial short-term funding availability to all banks, helped mitigate the risks of a full-blown banking crisis, but could not fully prevent investor angst from spreading overseas. Rapid deposit flight forced the Swiss National Bank to quickly arrange a forced merger between the nation’s second largest financial institution, Credit Suisse with UBS. Global equities, as measured by the MSCI World Index, rose +3.1% in March as a confluence of factors, including a sharp decline in real interest rates, swift U.S. regulatory action to backstop the banking system, and moderating February inflation data, combined to boost investor confidence. Global bonds rallied sharply over the month, as significant risks across the banking sector led investors to conclude that lending would be sharply curtailed, and as a result, a U.S. recession was now considerably more likely.

Despite the likelihood of significant contagion risk in the banking sector has probably been avoided, we are mindful that the deposit flight experienced by many U.S. regional banks is likely to weigh on future credit formation and increase the headwinds on an economy that is already decelerating. In addition, U.S. equity valuations are not inexpensive relative to their own histories and short-term U.S. interest rates remain elevated. In this environment, we remain underweight equities, though have become more constructive on non-US exposure. We are leaning into idiosyncratic risks with an emphasis on quality and pricing power in our core holdings, notably companies we believe are more likely to deliver consistent cash flows during a period of decelerating economic growth. We are more constructive on fixed income as short-term U.S. interest rates are at elevated levels relative to recent history. We have increased exposure to duration, taking it closer to neutral vs. the benchmark, reflective of the view that are approaching the peak of the U.S. Fed Funds rate. In-line with the fund’s risk aware mandate, we look to balance exposure to risk assets with a diversified allocation to portfolio hedges, with a reliance on high quality carry via income yielding assets coupled with derivatives and cash.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

Global markets relinquished large portions of their January gains following the release of several key pieces of U.S. economic data during February that came in higher than expected, notably U.S. non-farm payroll figures, producer price data, and PCE Deflator data (the Fed’s preferred inflation gauge). In each instance, these higher-than-expected economic statistics sent both stocks and bonds lower, as investors anticipated that the U.S. Federal Reserve would need to further tighten monetary policy to contain inflation. Global stocks, as measured by the MSCI World Index, fell -2.4% as investors braced for a “higher for longer” interest rate environment. Emerging market stocks were particularly hard hit due to a rebound in the U.S. dollar.

Global bonds performed poorly in February, as the higher-than-expected U.S. jobs and inflation data highlighted above stoked concerns about the likelihood of tighter U.S. monetary policy. Duration-sensitive long-maturity bonds, such as 10-year U.S. Treasuries and developed market International Sovereign bonds, fared particularly badly as investors concluded that the world’s major central banks are likely to keep short-term rates elevated for a protracted period. Looking ahead, we believe that stronger-than-expected economic data is indicative that the U.S. will likely avoid a deep recession. While a positive nominal U.S. GDP may spare corporate earnings from significant revisions, stubbornly high inflation will continue to be a headwind for equities as the Fed will likely maintain restrictive monetary policy for the near-term. In this environment, we remain underweight equities, though have become more constructive on non-US exposure. We are leaning into idiosyncratic risks with an emphasis on quality and pricing power in our core holdings, notably companies we believe are more likely to deliver consistent cash flows during a period of decelerating economic growth. We are much more constructive on fixed income as short-term U.S. interest rates are at their highest levels in a generation. While we believe the bulk of the U.S. interest rate hikes have occurred, we see continued tightening from central banks (albeit at smaller increments), and thus maintain a partial underweight to duration (notably via Japanese rates). In-line with the fund’s risk aware mandate, we look to balance exposure to risk assets with a diversified allocation to portfolio hedges, with a reliance on high quality carry via income yielding assets coupled with derivatives and cash.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

Global stocks declined in December, ending 2022 on a down note and putting to rest the worst calendar year for equities since 2008’s Global Financial Crisis. Global bond performance for the month was mixed. Shorter-dated bond prices were mostly stable during December, but longer-maturity bond prices were negatively impacted by data indicating continued strength in the U.S. labor market. Mid-month, the U.S. Federal Reserve approved an interest rate increase of +0.50% and signalled its intent to lift rates through the spring to combat inflation. Although the Fed’s decision marked a deceleration from four consecutive increases of +0.75% beginning back in mid-June, investor concerns about the potential negative impacts that addition rate increases could have on the economy – and corporate profits – weighed on equity performance. In addition, the Bank of Japan’s decision to alter its policy of “yield curve control” (YCC) also weighed on global risk assets, as the consequences of the shift encouraged Japanese investors to sell their foreign securities holdings (including U.S. Treasuries) and repatriate capital back home, further draining liquidity from global capital markets.

Looking ahead, we continue to make a case that despite the challenges faced in 2022, people underestimate how adaptive, innovative, and flexible the US economy can be. As a result, we believe that the U.S. will likely avoid a material economic contraction in 2023 (and may avoid a recession altogether), as the strength of the U.S. labor market should provide structural support for overall consumption. Across asset classes, within the Global Allocation Fund, we maintain a neutral view on equities in the short-term as we except U.S. Federal Reserve (Fed) policy to remain restrictive in the coming months. In this environment, we remain patient and are leaning into idiosyncratic risks with an emphasis on quality and pricing power in our core holdings, notably companies we believe are more likely to deliver consistent cash flows during a period of decelerating economic growth. Our preferred exposures reflect a bias in favor of quality, GARP (growth at a reasonable price) and select areas of resources where we anticipate supply to remain constrained for the foreseeable future. We are much more constructive on fixed income as we believe the historic back-up in yields YTD represents a generational inflection point and continue to look for ways to build carry into the portfolio, notably via high quality investment grade credit and agency mortgages. While we believe the bulk of the U.S. interest rate hikes have occurred, we see continued tightening from central banks (albeit at smaller increments), and thus maintain a partial underweight to duration (notably via non-US rates). In-line with the fund’s risk aware mandate, we look to balance exposure to risk assets with a diversified allocation to portfolio hedges, with a reliance on high quality carry via income yielding assets within the portfolio coupled with a balance in cash, the U.S. dollar, and derivatives. Total equity exposure decreased, driven largely by market movement, as equities were down amidst investor concern that future rate increases could have corporate earnings and risk assets. Our core positioning remained stable, as we believe equities will remain volatile, but range bound in the coming months.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee