8IP Australian Small Companies (FHT0012AU) Report & Performance

What is the 8IP Australian Small Companies fund?

8IP Australian Small Companies aims to outperform the S&P/ASX Small Ordinaries Accumulation Index over rolling 5 year periods. The Investment Manager will do so by seeking to invest primarily in companies with a multi-year competitive advantage, turnaround situations or under-researched companies.

  • The Fund primarily invests in the ordinary shares of listed Australian companies with a focus on companies outside the Top 100 companies by market capitalization listed on the ASX.
  • The Fund may also invest in Australian unlisted securities and will generally be fully invested, meaning that it will not normally hold significant levels of cash.
  • Be aware that up to 10% of the Fund may consist of unlisted investments which are generally illiquid.

Growth of $1000 Investment Over Time

Performance Report

Peer Comparison Report

Peer Comparison Report

Latest News & Updates For 8IP Australian Small Companies

8IP Australian Small Companies Fund Commentary April 30, 2023

April saw local and global equity markets rally with the fund returning 4.08%, +1.31% against the benchmark, which posted a return of 2.78%. Our best performers were Cettire, Telix Pharmaceuticals and Strike Energy. Cettire (CTT, +33.56%) returned to favour after a few of months of underperformance. There was no company specific news, although we did note an increase in web traffic which should bode well for the company’s top line growth. Telix (TLX, +47.10%) rallied after releasing an impressive March quarterly result.

Total revenues were up 27% YoY, of which ILLUCIX sales were up 31.1% QoQ. As a result, the market rebased their expectations upwards for the remainder of CY23 and as such the company experienced a well-deserved re-rate. Strike Energy (STX, +26.67%) traded firmer after advising the market of its completion of initial engineering at South Erragulla for its modular plant.

This will provide an initial 40 TJ/d to support production from its existing reserves. The company also announced the successful refinancing of its $153 million debt facility with Macquarie Bank. Our worst performers were our small positions in Nova Minerals, AMA Group and Hartshead Resources.

READ HISTORICAL PERFORMANCE COMMENTARIES

Product Snapshot

  • Product Overview
  • Performance Review
  • Peer Comparison
  • Product Details

Product Overview

Fund Name APIR Code
? A Product Code is unique a identifier code issued by a group or governing body, to reference products in a large group. For an example, APIR codes are commonly used for Funds and Ticker codes are commonly used for Securities such as ETFs and Stocks.
Structure
?
Asset Class
? An Asset Class breakdown provides the percentages of core asset classes found within a mutual fund, exchange-traded fund, or another portfolio. Asset classes (in microeconomics and beyond) generally refer to broad categories such as equities, fixed income, and commodities.
Asset Category
? An Asset Category is a grouping of investments that exhibit similar characteristics and are subject to the same laws and regulations. Asset categories (or a sub-asset class) are made up of instruments which often behave similarly to one another in the marketplace, looking down to the Asset Category level is important if looking to build a diversified portfolio.
Peer Benchmark Name
? A Peer Index (benchmark) refers to a peer group of investment managers who have the same investment style or category. It is used to compare the performance of one manager to their peer group, which makes it simpler for investors to choose between the vast number of investment managers.
Broad Market Index
? A Market Index (benchmark) refers to a hypothetical portfolio of investments that represents a segment, asset or category of an investable market. Market Indices are used to benchmark managers performance, to assist their style reliability and ability to provide excess returns.
FUM
? Funds/Assets under management (AUM) is the total market value of the investments that a person or entity manages on behalf of clients. Assets under management definitions and formulas vary by company.
Management Fee
? A management fee is a charge levied by an investment manager for managing an investment fund. The management fee is intended to compensate the managers for their time and expertise for selecting finanical products and managing the portfolio.
Performance Fee
? A performance fee is a payment made to an investment manager for generating positive returns. This is as opposed to a management fee, which is charged without regard to returns. A performance fee can be calculated many ways. Most common is as a percentage of investment profits, often both realized and unrealized. It is largely a feature of the hedge fund industry, where performance fees have made many hedge fund managers among the wealthiest people in the world.
Spread
? A spread can have several meanings in finance. Basically, however, they all refer to the difference between two prices, rates or yields. In one of the most common definitions, the spread is the gap between the bid and the ask prices of a security or asset, like a stock, bond or commodity. This is known as a bid-ask spread.
8IP Australian Small CompaniesFHT0012AUManaged FundsDomestic EquityAustralian Small CapDomestic Equity - Small Cap IndexASX Index Small Ordinaries Index13.90 M1.2%0.00%0.8%

Performance Review

Fund Name Last Month
? Returns after fees in the most recent (last) month).
3 Months Return
? Returns after fees in the most recent 3 months.
1 Year Return
? Trailing 12 month returns.
3 Years Average Return
? Average Annual returns from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Average Return
? Average (annualised) returns since inception
1 Year Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The standard deviation (or annual volatility) of the last 12 months.
3 Years Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) from the last 3 years.
Since Inc. Std. Dev. (Annual)
? The average standard deviation (or annual volatility) since the fund inception.
1 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 12 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
3 Year Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown in the last 36 months - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
Since Inc. Max Drawdown
? The maximum drawdown since inception - a drawdown is a peak-to-trough decline during a specific period for an investment, trading account, or fund.
8IP Australian Small Companies-5.04%-2.29%-12.28%2.22%2.73%23.38%18.54%22.49%-15.34%-34.37%-56.92%

Peer Comparison

Fund Name Peer Index Name
? A group of individuals who share similar characteristics and interests are called peer groups. Peer group analysis is an essential part of assessing a price for a particular stock in investment research. The emphasis here is on making a comparison, meaning that the peer group constituents should be more or less identical to the company being examined, especially in terms of their main business and market capitalization areas.
12 Months Excess Return
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
Excess Return Annualised Since Inception
? Excess returns are an important metric that helps an investor to gauge performance in comparison to other investment alternatives. In general, all investors hope for positive excess return because it provides an investor with more money than they could have achieved by investing elsewhere.
12 Months Alpha
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market return over 12 months. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
Alpha Annualised Since Inception
? Alpha is used in finance as a measure of performance, indicating when a strategy, trader, or portfolio manager has managed to beat the market annualized since inception. Alpha, often considered the active return on an investment, gauges the performance of an investment against a market index or benchmark that is considered to represent the market’s movement as a whole.
12 Months Beta
? Rolling 12Month Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
Beta Annualised Since Inception
? Beta is a measure of the volatility—or systematic risk—of a security or portfolio compared to the market as a whole. Beta is used in the capital asset pricing model (CAPM), which describes the relationship between systematic risk and expected return for assets (usually stocks).
12 Months Tracking Error
? 12Month Tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark over the last 12 months. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
Tracking Error Since Inception
? Since Inception tracking error is the difference in actual performance between a position (usually an entire portfolio) and its corresponding benchmark since inception. The tracking error can be viewed as an indicator of how actively a fund is managed and its corresponding risk level. Evaluating a past tracking error of a portfolio manager may provide insight into the level of benchmark risk control the manager may demonstrate in the future.
12 Months Correlation
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
Correlation Since Inception
? Correlation, in the finance and investment industries, is a statistic that measures the degree to which two securities move in relation to each other. Correlations are used in advanced portfolio management, computed as the correlation coefficient, which has a value that must fall between -1.0 and +1.0.
8IP Australian Small CompaniesDomestic Equity - Small Cap Index-8.75%-1.91%-0.68%-0.2%-0.2%1.235.62%10.13%0.990.91

Product Details

Fund Name Verifed by SMSF Mates Manager Address Phone Website Email
8IP Australian Small CompaniesYesLevel 34, 1 Eagle Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000+61 7 3184 9118https://www.8ip.com.au/enquiries@8ip.com.au

Product Due Diligence

What is 8IP Australian Small Companies

8IP Australian Small Companies is an Managed Funds investment product that is benchmarked against ASX Index Small Ordinaries Index and sits inside the Domestic Equity - Small Cap Index. Think of a benchmark as a standard where investment performance can be measured. Typically, market indices like the ASX200 and market-segment stock indexes are used for this purpose. The 8IP Australian Small Companies has Assets Under Management of 13.90 M with a management fee of 1.2%, a performance fee of 0.00% and a buy/sell spread fee of 0.8%.

How has the investment product performed recently?

The recent investment performance of the investment product shows that the 8IP Australian Small Companies has returned -5.04% in the last month. The previous three years have returned 2.22% annualised and 22.49% each year since inception, which is when the 8IP Australian Small Companies first started.

How is risk measured in this investment product?

There are many ways that the risk of an investment product can be measured, and each measurement provides a different insight into the risk present. They can be used on their own or together to perform a risk assessment before investing, but when comparing investments, it is common to compare like for like risk measurements to determine which investment holds the most risk. Since 8IP Australian Small Companies first started, the Sharpe ratio is 0.12 with an annualised volatility of 22.49%. The maximum drawdown of the investment product in the last 12 months is -15.34% and -56.92% since inception. The maximum drawdown is defined as the high-to-low decline of an investment during a particular time period.

What is the relative performance of the investment product?

Relative performance is what an asset achieves over a period of time compared to similar investments or its peers. Relative return is a measure of the asset's performance compared to the return to the other investment. The 8IP Australian Small Companies has a 12-month excess return when compared to the Domestic Equity - Small Cap Index of -8.75% and -1.91% since inception.

Does the investment product produce Alpha over its Peers?

Alpha is an investing term used to measure an investment's outperformance relative to a market benchmark or peer investment. Alpha describes the excess return generated when compared to peer investment. 8IP Australian Small Companies has produced Alpha over the Domestic Equity - Small Cap Index of -0.68% in the last 12 months and -0.2% since inception.

What are similar investment products?

For a full list of investment products in the Domestic Equity - Small Cap Index category, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

What level of diversification will 8IP Australian Small Companies provide?

8IP Australian Small Companies has a correlation coefficient of 0.91 and a beta of 1.23 when compared to the Domestic Equity - Small Cap Index. Correlation measures how similarly two investments move in relation to one another. This establishes a 'correlation coefficient', which has a value between -1.0 and +1.0. A 100% correlation between two investments means that the correlation coefficient is +1. Beta in investments measures how much the price moves relative to the broader market over a period of time. If the investment moves more than the broader market, it has a beta above 1.0. If it moves less than the broader market, then the beta is less than 1.0. Investments with a high beta tend to carry more risk but have the potential to deliver higher returns.

How do I compare the investment product with its peers?

For a full quantitative report on 8IP Australian Small Companies and its peer investments, you can click here for the Peer Investment Report.

How do I compare the 8IP Australian Small Companies with the ASX Index Small Ordinaries Index?

For a full quantitative report on 8IP Australian Small Companies compared to the ASX Index Small Ordinaries Index, you can click here.

Can I sort and compare the 8IP Australian Small Companies to do my own analysis?

To sort and compare the 8IP Australian Small Companies financial metrics, please refer to the table above.

Has the 8IP Australian Small Companies been independently verified by SMSF Mate?

This investment product is in the process of being independently verified by SMSF Mate. Once we have verified the investment product, you will be able to find more information here.

How can I invest in 8IP Australian Small Companies?

If you or your self managed super fund would like to invest in the 8IP Australian Small Companies please contact Level 34, 1 Eagle Street, Brisbane, QLD 4000 via phone +61 7 3184 9118 or via email enquiries@8ip.com.au.

How do I get in contact with the 8IP Australian Small Companies?

If you would like to get in contact with the 8IP Australian Small Companies manager, please call +61 7 3184 9118.

Comments from SMSF Mates

SMSF Mate does not receive commissions or kickbacks from the 8IP Australian Small Companies. All data and commentary for this fund is provided free of charge for our readers general information.

Historical Performance Commentary

Performance Commentary - March 31, 2023

March saw equity markets finish mixed with our local market softer. The fund returned -1.14% after fees, -0.42% against the benchmark which posted a return of -0.72%. Our best performers were Liontown, Westgold and Bellevue Gold. Liontown (LTR, +89.71%) increased substantially towards the end of March after the company announced it had received a non-binding indicative proposal from Albermarle (NYSE: ALB) to acquire the company at $2.50 per share (a 63.9% premium to last close). This followed prior proposed bids received in October 2022 and March 2023 at $2.20 and $2.35 respectively.

Performance Commentary - February 28, 2023

February saw local and global equity markets correct with the fund returning -3.87% after fees, -0.17% against the benchmark which posted a return of -3.70%. Our best performers were AUB, HUB24 and Ridley. AUB (AUB, +17.44%) performed strongly after releasing an 8.5% beat against market expectations for their 1H23 net profit result and upgrading full year guidance for a second time. The result was assisted by positive trading conditions and the company’s recent acquisition, Tysers, which performed ahead of expectations.

HUB24 (HUB, +11.33%) continued its upward trajectory reporting a strong 1H23 result. Whilst the result was broadly in line with consensus expectations, top line growth surprised to the upside driven by higher-thanexpected Funds Under Advice (FUA). The company continues to deliver on its stated goals, and we remain favourable on the long-term growth thematic for the platform division.

Ridley (RIC, +13.70%) traded positively after releasing its 1H23 result. All metrics were a beat to expectations with Revenue (+25& YoY), EBITDA (+13% YoY) and NPAT (+21% YoY). The outlook for the business was also firm with 2H23 EBITDA expected to improve on the prior period. Our worst performers were Westgold Resources, PWR and Global Lithium.

Westgold (WGX, -21.81%) traded weaker on no company specific news, however, gold, was softer (-5.58%) and compounding this was the weakness in the AUD against the USD (-4.66%). These moves were somewhat driven by higher cash rate expectations being priced in to curb persistent inflationary pressures.

Performance Commentary - January 31, 2023

January saw local and global equity markets rebound strongly with the fund returning +5.46% after fees, -1.09% against the benchmark which posted a return of +6.56%. Our best performers were Pro Medicus, De Grey Mining and Boss Energy. Pro Medicus (PME, +20.97%) outperformed considerably throughout the month signing two new deals worth $A37 million. These contracts reflect increasing organic sales momentum within the business and further validate our view that the company is one of the highest quality growth investments in our universe.

De Grey Mining (DEG, +15.95%) traded strongly benefiting from a higher gold price (+6.52%) and weaker US dollar (- 3.42%). The company also released its December quarterly report which showed the company is on track to complete its DFS in mid-2023. Boss Energy (BOE, +20.66%) bounced after being sold off heavily the previous month helped by a firmer uranium price (~+4.38%). The company also released its December quarterly which showed that the restart of the Honeymoon mine is on time and on budget with first production targeted in 4QCY23.

Our worst performers were Austal, OFX Group and Jervois.

Austal (ASB, -20.19%) sold off heavily after announcing a disappointing and unexpected downgrade to earnings. The reduction was on the back of increased costs in the construction of US T-ATS vessels. Whilst the company is engaging in cost recovery, the probability of this occurring is difficult to quantify, and additional business is maturing which may see margin risk. Given this we have since exited our position.

Performance Commentary - December 31, 2022

December saw local and global equity markets (ex. Hong Kong) reverse November’s rally and end 2022 on a negative note. The fund returned -5.13% after fees, -1.40% against the benchmark which posted a return of – 3.73%. Our best performers were Chalice Mining, St Barbara and Red 5. St Barbara (SBM, +28.10%) and Red 5 (RED, +28.13%) both benefited as the U.S. Dollar Index continued to decline (- 2.53%) and the underlying gold price appreciated (+3.77%).

In corporate news, SBM announced the company will merge with Genesis Minerals (GMD). RED provided an incrementally positive update declaring commercial production at their King of the Hills (KOTH) operation and providing positive second half fiscal 2023 production guidance numbers. The company also announced high-grade drilling results at their Darlot mine. Chalice (CHN, +18.64%) continued to rally after announcing promising mineralisation at the company’s Hooley Prospect. Additionally, underlying commodity prices (Nickel +14.81%, Copper +2.31%, Platinum +3.37%) were all firmer. Our worst performers were Life360, Johns Lyng and Ioneer. Life360 (360, -22.24%) continued its poor share price performance selling off aggressively throughout the month. There was no company news to attribute the weakness, although, general risk off sentiment and marked increases in bond yields meant current loss-making companies such as Life360 suffered. John Lyng (JLG, -15.09%) was weaker following an unexpected management selldown which was taken poorly by the market.

Fundamentally, the company has reiterated earnings guidance, and by all accounts the business is still performing strongly. Ioneer (INR, -33.91%) sold off strongly primarily because of the correction in underlying lithium benchmark prices. The sentiment towards the sector continues to gyrate, the current negative sentiment historically has provided an attractive point to add to our holdings in those companies which are being indiscriminately sold.

Performance Commentary - November 30, 2022

November saw local and global equity markets continue to rally. The fund returned +2.24% after fees, -2.69% against the benchmark which posted a return of +4.92%. Our best performers were Bellevue Gold, De Grey Mining and PWR.

Bellevue Gold (BGL, +48.65%) and De Grey Mining (DEG, +21.70%) benefited as the U.S. Dollar Index declined (- 4.96%) and the underlying gold price appreciated (+7.27%). Both companies also released positive news at their respective mining projects. BGL provided an update of its grade control drilling with a +17% increase in overall ounces and a +25% increase on overall grade. DEG reported significant positive results from drilling within the ‘Great Hemi Corridor’ in Western Australia. PWR Holdings (PWH, +16.52%) continued to perform strongly after announcing the appointment of Mr Kym Osley as a non-executive director. Mr Osley has deep experience in the defence industry, indicating PWH’s increased focus on the vertical. Additionally, the company also held its Annual General Meeting (AGM), although, no new information was released.

Our worst performers were Elders, Select Harvests and Life360. Elders (ELD, -20.62%) sold off aggressively after reporting a strong Fiscal Year 2022 result. The result was in line with expectations; however, the market was focused on the unexpected announcement that longstanding and very highly regarded CEO Mark Ellison will retire by November 2023.

Performance Commentary - October 31, 2022

October saw local and global equity markets (ex. HK/China) rebound following a weak September. The fund returned +5.28% after fees, -1.17% against the benchmark which posted a return of +6.46%. Our best performers were Life360, HUB24 and PWR Holdings. Life360 (360, +39.60%) traded positively throughout the month, particularly after announcing price increases on their premium monthly plans. Whilst the benefit is not expected this calendar year, demonstrating pricing power with limited churn is impressive in the current environment. HUB24 (HUB, +21.48%) reported strong numbers for their first quarter of fiscal year 2023. The company recorded $3.0bn of net flows, outperforming peers. The result was impressive given it was delivered during a volatile period for investment markets. Additionally, the company was able to negotiate better than expected terms with new cash deposit partner Bank of Queensland. PWR Holdings (PWH, +18.65%) recovered after being sold off late the previous month, ostensibly on currency volatility. The main perceived headwind was a depreciating British pound (GBP); however, this volatility has stabilised, and we note that the company hedges its exposure. The core business remains strong.

Performance Commentary - September 30, 2022

September saw risk off sentiment return to both global and local equity markets. The fund returned -8.31% after fees in September, +2.89% against the benchmark which posted a return of – 11.20%. Our best performers were Megaport, De Grey Mining and Select Harvests. Megaport (MP1, +7.3%) recovered after considerable underperformance last month. News flow was light, and the current share price movement suggests the market is waiting to digest the Q1 2023 update, which is scheduled for release towards the back end of October. De Grey Mining (DEG, +6.12%) performed strongly after releasing a better-than-expected Pre-Feasibility Study (PFS) for their Mallina Gold Project located in the Pilbara region of Western Australia. The PFS saw improvements over the original scoping study, particularly in the production profile. The company’s economics and size of resource are attractive which may entice an outside group to pay up for control of this asset. Select Harvests (SHV, +6.05%) traded positively after releasing a crop and pollination update. The company noted weaker crop production in both California and Spain have resulted in stronger market pricing for almonds and importantly the company has been able to optimise bee pollination of their orchards for their 2023 crop. Our worst performers were AUB, HUB24 and Johns Lyng.

Kind words from Aussies managing
their own self funded futures

  • SMSF Mate is a unique website because it has ideas about how to approach SMSFs, insurance and other financial topics that come straight from first hand experience. It's much more useful than what you find on all the other financial websites that just offer generic info that you could easily get on the ATO's website. It's also nice to know there's no financial incentive behind the information, it's legitimately there to help people understand self-managed super funds and how to get the most out of them, not to get an affiliate commission from a broker or other financial services provider. The investment product information is also incredibly useful, I've never seen this kind of functionality on any other website that let's you look at such a wide range of products, sort by what info is most interesting or important to you, and subscribe to updates for different funds and financial products all in one place. Definitely worth checking out if you own or are considering an SMSF!

    David G, Self-Employed, SMSF Owner
  • SMSF Mate provides a unique insight into superannuation and financial topics in a way that is easier to understand than conventional websites. The colloquial nature of the site makes it easy to understand and they often speak about complicated topics in lamens terms so I can wrap my head around them. The investment product information is a great way to research funds that I am interested in investing in with my SMSF and there is a lot of helpful information on the site for better structuring my investment portfolio. In comparison to other websites which offer similar information, SMSF Mate excels as the information is free to access whereas many other sites charge a subscription fee for the same thing. Overall, I think SMSF Mate is a great resource for SMSF trustees and is worth looking at for a variety of super-related topics. Thanks.

    Tim B, Business Owner, SMSF Trustee